Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Racism in Congress: The Black Caucus
Capitalism Magazine ^ | December 23, 2002 | Ron Pisaturo

Posted on 12/23/2002 2:25:06 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
Why is the media silent on this issue? A Congressional White Caucus dedicated to advancing "white interests" wouldn't last 2 seconds before being obliterated by the nonstop media maelstrom.
41 posted on 12/23/2002 5:46:04 PM PST by Godel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Two hundred years from now, no history textbook will mention the Trent Lott incident or even Trent Lott. But the textbooks will contain statements such as this: “Even as late as the 21st century, brazen racism was entrenched in American government. There was even a gang of Congressmen that called itself ‘The Congressional Black Caucus!’”

I doubt it. 200 years from now, whites will be a virtually extinct and hated/persecuted minority all over the world very much like the Jews. Programs like affirmative action will be seen as necessary to break the oppressive evil hold of white males on the government. Organizations like the Congressional Black Caucus will be seen as noble for standing up against the most evil group in history. Remember, history is written by the victors, the average white woman has only 1.4 children when you need 2.1 to break even. In 200 years whites will be a minority in both US and Europe and because of their disproportionate success in job/academic fields they will be hated and envied and laws will be passed to discriminate against and hold them back. Think about it, if whites can't get a fair shake on affirmative action, etc today, how the hell can you expect it in 200 years when you're a minority?

42 posted on 12/23/2002 5:52:36 PM PST by Godel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
When you look at macro economic picture, you have to look at them as a group.

This is exactly the collectivist racist reasoning that this article is about.

43 posted on 12/23/2002 5:54:19 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Anyone who restricts their own market on racial grounds is restricting their own potential profits.
44 posted on 12/23/2002 5:56:17 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
You should not accuse people of racism so lightly: it's an insult and a sin when you have no reasons whatever for such an opinion.

Note also that you provide no reasoning in your posts. I tried to explain to you the errors. Like child, you merely repeat yourself. I am not interested in such exchange.

Have a merry Christmas.

45 posted on 12/23/2002 6:02:08 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
You claimed that racist restrictions on free enterprise do not cause competitive disadvantage. That is patently false. All resrictions on free enterprise cause competitive disadvantage to those who are restricted. I challenge you to refute this.

Your argument that blacks had no way to purchase any theoretical 'services' is also patently false.

The fact that blacks as a collective have less than whites is irrelevant to the workings of an open free enterprise system. Individuals are free to purchase whatever they can afford. Their race is irrelevant.

46 posted on 12/23/2002 6:14:23 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
GO buy a book, Joe.
47 posted on 12/23/2002 6:27:35 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Not all additions of a member productive by himself make the group more productive.

Is an individual unable to be productive because the majority of his collective race is unproductive?

Free Enterprise is a system of individual well-being. It is Socialism that is concerned with the collective well-being of groups, whether they be racial or socio-economic.

48 posted on 12/23/2002 6:34:10 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Andyman
Actually, I don't think the CBC is racist.

The CBC gives new meaning to the word "racist."

49 posted on 12/23/2002 6:38:22 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Bookmarked.
50 posted on 12/23/2002 6:38:56 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Ah, the minority caucus of the minority party. How prestigious. What set them off today? Oh, I see, they think that THEY caused Lott to step down. Hmmm. Nurse Ratchet - double the medication!
51 posted on 12/23/2002 7:19:51 PM PST by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american spirit
Let's start with 'honkey'.....No doubt, Al and Jesse use this phrase with regularity.
52 posted on 12/23/2002 7:34:59 PM PST by JimVT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JimVT
phrase=term
53 posted on 12/23/2002 7:35:48 PM PST by JimVT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; mhking
I wondered how long it would take for someone to focus on the Black Caucus. The rampant racism in this country is the disease of the Democrats, not the Republicans. That needs the spotlight until it is wiped out.
54 posted on 12/23/2002 9:30:15 PM PST by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
Amen and Amen!
55 posted on 12/24/2002 2:37:17 AM PST by TAIPAN22001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
A Congressional White Caucus would be immediately seen as segregationist and racist and would not to be tolerated. Ahh but the enlightened standards of our society deem some forms of racism to be more equal than others. The CBC is nothing more and nothing less than a liberal segregationist group pursuing that nefarious agenda known as liberalism.
56 posted on 12/24/2002 4:53:49 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
bump
57 posted on 12/24/2002 11:51:19 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
bump
58 posted on 12/24/2002 11:51:47 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
bump
59 posted on 12/24/2002 11:52:20 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w
Some don't know the $hit sandwhich exists they are awakening daily.
60 posted on 12/24/2002 11:53:28 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson