Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frist no friend of gun owners
WorldNetDaily ^ | Posted: December 23, 2002 | By Jon Dougherty

Posted on 12/23/2002 9:51:59 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park

CHANGING OF THE GUARD
Frist no friend of gun owners
Candidate for Senate leader has history of anti-firearms support

Posted: December 23, 2002
11:25 a.m. Eastern

By Jon Dougherty
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

More questions have arisen about the GOP senator most likely to replace Mississippi Republican Trent Lott as majority leader, this time from gun-rights groups who say he is no friend of the Second Amendment.

According to an analysis posted on firearms rights website KeepandBearArms.com Frist has a poor record of standing up for gun rights.

And Gun Owners of America, a 300,000-member group based in Springfield, Va., has given Frist the grade of "D" in regards to his record of votes regarding gun rights – despite his being a top recipient of donations from the National Rifle Association.

Among Frist's anti-gun votes, he:


• helped kill a filibuster on the Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform bill that conservatives believe squelched the voice of pro-gun groups;


• voted against a filibuster and in favor of sending an anti-gun crime bill to a House-Senate crime committee;


• voted with Democrats to help pass the Lautenberg anti-gun crime bill;


• supported two other gun control proposals.


"Trent Lott has been an unprincipled disaster - the sooner he is made to fall on his sword, the better," wrote David Codrea, a co-founder of Citizens of America, a national gun-rights advertising campaign. "But Bill Frist is a completely unacceptable replacement. Republicans will elect him Senate majority leader at the risk of enraging and alienating the most reliable constituency they have ever had" – gun owners.

Lott resigned Friday, thanking his supporters.

"In the interest of pursuing the best possible agenda for the future of our country, I will not seek to remain as majority leader of the United States Senate for the 108th Congress effective Jan. 6, 2003," he said.

"To all those who offered me their friendship, support and prayers, I will be eternally grateful. I will continue to serve the people of Mississippi in the United States Senate," he added.

Bush praised Lott for his decision.

"It was a very difficult decision Trent made on behalf of the American people," said the president in a statement. "Trent is a valued friend and a man I respect. I am pleased he will continue to serve our nation in the Senate and look forward to working with him on our agenda to make America safer, stronger and better."

Lott faulted himself for the controversy. He said he had fallen into a "trap" set by his political enemies and had "only myself to blame."

The Washington Post reported Monday that Frist is poised to become the first majority leader "elected" by telephone.

Frist, an ally of Bush who is the Senate's only physician, also has a history of backing supporters of other controversial measures that are not palatable to most Republicans, like abortion and stem-cell research.

WorldNetDaily reported Friday that the junior Tennessee senator championed the nomination by President Clinton of former Surgeon General David Satcher, a fervent supporter of unrestricted abortion and someone who actually performed abortions.

And, Frist – a heart surgeon – once told National Public Radio that there are no absolute right, absolute wrong answers in medicine. During last year's stem-cell debate, he proposed using leftover embryos from in-vitro fertilization clinics for scientific research. The Weekly Standard also noted that Frist believes there is a moral imperative to use one unsalvageable life to save another.

Sen. Pete Dominici, R-N.M., threw his support to Frist last week, telling Fox News he wanted to move up a Jan. 6 Republican conference meeting to debate the party's fate and affirm Frist as the party leader.

Virginia's two Republican senators, John Warner and George Allen, backed Frist last week.

Over the weekend, other colleagues praised Frist and said they looked forward to his leadership.

"He personifies not just the rhetoric about idealism but as a life that has been lived," said Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., on Fox News Sunday. "There are actually hands-on examples of how he will make a difference. And I think it's a very exciting prospect."

Frist will "be a different face than what we've had," added Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. "I'm not criticizing what we've had, but I think Bill has a kind of a more moderate record and a more moderate approach toward things, and I think that it's going to be very difficult to criticize him."

Others predicted Lott's demise would be forgotten soon.

"In the long sweep of American history, this is going to be a blip," Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

THIS article at WND


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: Jesse

But I will be surprised if, in 6 months, conservatives aren't complaining about Frist being a cure worse than the disease.

I wouldn't wager against you.

Another one that I would have preferred over Frist:

Senator Don Nickles of Oklahoma

Political Experience:
Senator, United States Senate, 1980-present;
Senate Majority Whip, 1996-2001
Senate Minority Whip, 2001-2002
2001-1999 On the votes that the National Right to Life Committee considered to be the most important , Senator Nickles voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1997-2002: On the votes that the Christian Coalition considered to be the most important , Senator Nickles voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2001: On the votes that the Conservative Index - The John Birch Society considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Nickles voted their preferred position 90 percent of the time. 2000: voted their preferred position 83 percent of the time. 1999: voted their preferred position 80 percent of the time.

2001: On the votes that the American Conservative Union considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Nickles voted their preferred position 92 percent of the time. 2000: voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. 1999: voted their preferred position 96 percent of the time.

2000: On the votes that the Family Research Council considered to be the most important in 2000, Senator Nickles voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2001: Based on the votes that the Gun Owners of America considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Nickles voted in support of their preferred position 60 percent of the time. 1999: voted their preferred position 64 percent of the time.

61 posted on 12/23/2002 8:06:03 PM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
bump
62 posted on 12/23/2002 8:30:45 PM PST by aeronca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson