Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paulklenk
Well, hello, Paul. In the two years you have been here, I don't think I've read a post by you. I hope it is not because you really don't have anything of value to say.

Check Episodes #1 and #2. They are both sourced. If you don't like this one, don't pass it on to either of your friends. There will be more. It is probably better that you don't read them. And you certainly wouldn't want to bump them to the top. That would make you look really foolish.

35 posted on 12/22/2002 11:23:24 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
Actually, dougie-poo, I did read your other two posts, and they were equally lame, but for other reasons. The whole "Jew bastard" story, even if true, is lame for two reasons: first, so what if she said that -- no one with a brain gives a crap anymore [even if every American hears of this incident it's not going to make a difference]; and two, a lie detector test proves nothing. Lie detector tests are not reliable. If Hillary took a lie detector test and passed, you would probably find a reason to discount it. And if The American Spectator is the primary source for the hospital story, it's not much of a source [too partisan]. Even if the story is true, the hospital is as much or more to blame for the incident; plus, it's something any politician, regardless of party, would do. Politicians and celebreties pull stunts like this all the time. Most of us adults figured that out a long time ago.

If we want to stop Hillary, we have to cut out this juvenile, ineffective FR-style of Hillary bashing and thwart her with something more substantial [like -- gee -- how about on policy?]. Or, if she really is a criminal [and I wouldn't put that past her], then put her the hell in jail, and don't ask some Larry Klayman type loser to prosecute her. Put up or shut up on the criminal thing.

But Hillary's negatives are too strong for her to win the presidency, so why are we worrying?
36 posted on 12/22/2002 11:41:47 PM PST by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Take heart Doug. Those of us who have been around for awhile believe in your veracity and that of your sources.
253 posted on 02/23/2003 12:20:03 PM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/030714/168/4oi9j.html&e=4&ncid=1756

He makes a good point. You wouldn't want to look foolish posting rumors, would you?

325 posted on 07/16/2003 7:46:31 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson