Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abundy
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).
72 posted on 12/23/2002 11:07:07 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides; Teacher317
Thanks...never did like that case as it would allow any activity to be 'state action' if you have to go to Court to resolve a dispute.

If some idiot wants to lose business, that's his concern. There are plenty of other stores out there that will be DELIGHTED to take up the slack. (I also wonder why someone would want to frequent a shop, most especially an eatery, where the owner does not want their business. There are enough fast food horror stories to make me inspect my lunch twice before eating it!)

Well of course you are correct...but now you have outed yourself as a cracker racist....

(to the PC folks at SPLC and the rest of the liberals...)

74 posted on 12/23/2002 11:28:37 AM PST by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson