Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coffee,Tea,or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell attheAirport?
lewrockwell.com ^ | 12/18/2002 | Nicholas Monahan

Posted on 12/21/2002 11:33:05 AM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham

 

Coffee, Tea, or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wife’s Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell at the Airport and Then Lying About Why We Put You There?

by Nicholas Monahan

This morning I’ll be escorting my wife to the hospital, where the doctors will perform a caesarean section to remove our first child. She didn’t want to do it this way – neither of us did – but sometimes the Fates decide otherwise. The Fates or, in our case, government employees.

On the morning of October 26th Mary and I entered Portland International Airport, en route to the Las Vegas wedding of one of my best friends. Although we live in Los Angeles, we’d been in Oregon working on a film, and up to that point had had nothing but praise to shower on the city of Portland, a refreshing change of pace from our own suffocating metropolis.

At the security checkpoint I was led aside for the "inspection" that’s all the rage at airports these days. My shoes were removed. I was told to take off my sweater, then to fold over the waistband of my pants. My baseball hat, hastily jammed on my head at 5 AM, was removed and assiduously examined ("Anything could be in here, sir," I was told, after I asked what I could hide in a baseball hat. Yeah. Anything.) Soon I was standing on one foot, my arms stretched out, the other leg sticking out in front of me àla a DUI test. I began to get pissed off, as most normal people would. My anger increased when I realized that the newly knighted federal employees weren’t just examining me, but my 7½ months pregnant wife as well. I’d originally thought that I’d simply been randomly selected for the more excessive than normal search. You know, Number 50 or whatever. Apparently not though – it was both of us. These are your new threats, America: pregnant accountants and their sleepy husbands flying to weddings.

After some more grumbling on my part they eventually finished with me and I went to retrieve our luggage from the x-ray machine. Upon returning I found my wife sitting in a chair, crying. Mary rarely cries, and certainly not in public. When I asked her what was the matter, she tried to quell her tears and sobbed, "I’m sorry...it’s...they touched my breasts...and..." That’s all I heard. I marched up to the woman who’d been examining her and shouted, "What did you do to her?" Later I found out that in addition to touching her swollen breasts – to protect the American citizenry – the employee had asked that she lift up her shirt. Not behind a screen, not off to the side – no, right there, directly in front of the hundred or so passengers standing in line. And for you women who’ve been pregnant and worn maternity pants, you know how ridiculous those things look. "I felt like a clown," my wife told me later. "On display for all these people, with the cotton panel on my pants and my stomach sticking out. When I sat down I just lost my composure and began to cry. That’s when you walked up."

Of course when I say she "told me later," it’s because she wasn’t able to tell me at the time, because as soon as I demanded to know what the federal employee had done to make her cry, I was swarmed by Portland police officers. Instantly. Three of them, cinching my arms, locking me in handcuffs, and telling me I was under arrest. Now my wife really began to cry. As they led me away and she ran alongside, I implored her to calm down, to think of the baby, promising her that everything would turn out all right. She faded into the distance and I was shoved into an elevator, a cop holding each arm. After making me face the corner, the head honcho told that I was under arrest and that I wouldn’t be flying that day – that I was in fact a "menace."

It took me a while to regain my composure. I felt like I was one of those guys in The Gulag Archipelago who, because the proceedings all seem so unreal, doesn’t fully realize that he is in fact being arrested in a public place in front of crowds of people for...for what? I didn’t know what the crime was. Didn’t matter. Once upstairs, the officers made me remove my shoes and my hat and tossed me into a cell. Yes, your airports have prison cells, just like your amusement parks, train stations, universities, and national forests. Let freedom reign.

After a short time I received a visit from the arresting officer. "Mr. Monahan," he started, "Are you on drugs?"

Was this even real? "No, I’m not on drugs."

"Should you be?"

"What do you mean?"

"Should you be on any type of medication?"

"No."

"Then why’d you react that way back there?"

You see the thinking? You see what passes for reasoning among your domestic shock troops these days? Only "whackos" get angry over seeing the woman they’ve been with for ten years in tears because someone has touched her breasts. That kind of reaction – love, protection – it’s mind-boggling! "Mr. Monahan, are you on drugs?" His snide words rang inside my head. This is my wife, finally pregnant with our first child after months of failed attempts, after the depressing shock of the miscarriage last year, my wife who’d been walking on a cloud over having the opportunity to be a mother...and my anger is simply unfathomable to the guy standing in front of me, the guy who earns a living thanks to my taxes, the guy whose family I feed through my labor. What I did wasn’t normal. No, I reacted like a drug addict would’ve. I was so disgusted I felt like vomiting. But that was just the beginning.

An hour later, after I’d been gallantly assured by the officer that I wouldn’t be attending my friend’s wedding that day, I heard Mary’s voice outside my cell. The officer was speaking loudly, letting her know that he was planning on doing me a favor... which everyone knows is never a real favor. He wasn’t going to come over and help me work on my car or move some furniture. No, his "favor" was this: He’d decided not to charge me with a felony.

Think about that for a second. Rapes, car-jackings, murders, arsons – those are felonies. So is yelling in an airport now, apparently. I hadn’t realized, though I should have. Luckily, I was getting a favor, though. I was merely going to be slapped with a misdemeanor.

"Here’s your court date," he said as I was released from my cell. In addition, I was banned from Portland International for 90 days, and just in case I was thinking of coming over and hanging out around its perimeter, the officer gave me a map with the boundaries highlighted, sternly warning me against trespassing. Then he and a second officer escorted us off the grounds. Mary and I hurriedly drove two and a half hours in the rain to Seattle, where we eventually caught a flight to Vegas. But the officer was true to his word – we missed my friend’s wedding. The fact that he’d been in my own wedding party, the fact that a once in a lifetime event was stolen from us – well, who cares, right?

Upon our return to Portland (I’d had to fly into Seattle and drive back down), we immediately began contacting attorneys. We aren’t litigious people – we wanted no money. I’m not even sure what we fully wanted. An apology? A reprimand? I don’t know. It doesn’t matter though, because we couldn’t afford a lawyer, it turned out. $4,000 was the average figure bandied about as a retaining fee. Sorry, but I’ve got a new baby on the way. So we called the ACLU, figuring they existed for just such incidents as these. And they do apparently...but only if we were minorities. That’s what they told us.

In the meantime, I’d appealed my suspension from PDX. A week or so later I got a response from the Director of Aviation. After telling me how, in the aftermath of 9/11, most passengers not only accept additional airport screening but welcome it, he cut to the chase:

"After a review of the police report and my discussions with police staff, as well as a review of the TSA’s report on this incident, I concur with the officer’s decision to take you into custody and to issue a citation to you for disorderly conduct. That being said, because I also understand that you were upset and acted on your emotions, I am willing to lift the Airport Exclusion Order...."

Attached to this letter was the report the officer had filled out. I’d like to say I couldn’t believe it, but in a way, I could. It’s seemingly becoming the norm in America – lies and deliberate distortions on the part of those in power, no matter how much or how little power they actually wield.

The gist of his report was this: From the get go I wasn’t following the screener’s directions. I was "squinting my eyes" and talking to my wife in a "low, forced voice" while "excitedly swinging my arms." Twice I began to walk away from the screener, inhaling and exhaling forcefully. When I’d completed the physical exam, I walked to the luggage screening area, where a second screener took a pair of scissors from my suitcase. At this point I yelled, "What the %*&$% is going on? This is &*#&$%!" The officer, who’d already been called over by one of the screeners, became afraid for the TSA staff and the many travelers. He required the assistance of a second officer as he "struggled" to get me into handcuffs, then for "cover" called over a third as well. It was only at this point that my wife began to cry hysterically.

There was nothing poetic in my reaction to the arrest report. I didn’t crumple it in my fist and swear that justice would be served, promising to sacrifice my resources and time to see that it would. I simply stared. Clearly the officer didn’t have the guts to write down what had really happened. It might not look too good to see that stuff about the pregnant woman in tears because she’d been humiliated. Instead this was the official scenario being presented for the permanent record. It doesn’t even matter that it’s the most implausible sounding situation you can think of. "Hey, what the...godammit, they’re taking our scissors, honey!" Why didn’t he write in anything about a monkey wearing a fez?

True, the TSA staff had expropriated a pair of scissors from our toiletries kit – the story wasn’t entirely made up. Except that I’d been locked in airport jail at the time. I didn’t know anything about any scissors until Mary told me on our drive up to Seattle. They’d questioned her about them while I was in the bowels of the airport sitting in my cell.

So I wrote back, indignation and disgust flooding my brain.

"[W]hile I’m not sure, I’d guess that the entire incident is captured on video. Memory is imperfect on everyone’s part, but the footage won’t lie. I realize it might be procedurally difficult for you to view this, but if you could, I’d appreciate it. There’s no willful disregard of screening directions. No explosion over the discovery of a pair of scissors in a suitcase. No struggle to put handcuffs on. There’s a tired man, early in the morning, unhappily going through a rigorous procedure and then reacting to the tears of his pregnant wife."

Eventually we heard back from a different person, the guy in charge of the TSA airport screeners. One of his employees had made the damning statement about me exploding over her scissor discovery, and the officer had deftly incorporated that statement into his report. We asked the guy if he could find out why she’d said this – couldn’t she possibly be mistaken? "Oh, can’t do that, my hands are tied. It’s kind of like leading a witness – I could get in trouble, heh heh." Then what about the videotape? Why not watch that? That would exonerate me. "Oh, we destroy all video after three days."

Sure you do.

A few days later we heard from him again. He just wanted to inform us that he’d received corroboration of the officer’s report from the officer’s superior, a name we didn’t recognize. "But...he wasn’t even there," my wife said.

"Yeah, well, uh, he’s corroborated it though."

That’s how it works.

"Oh, and we did look at the videotape. Inconclusive."

But I thought it was destroyed?

On and on it went. Due to the tenacity of my wife in making phone calls and speaking with relevant persons, the "crime" was eventually lowered to a mere citation. Only she could have done that. I would’ve simply accepted what was being thrown at me, trumped up charges and all, simply because I’m wholly inadequate at performing the kowtow. There’s no way I could have contacted all the people Mary did and somehow pretend to be contrite. Besides, I speak in a low, forced voice, which doesn’t elicit sympathy. Just police suspicion.

Weeks later at the courthouse I listened to a young DA awkwardly read the charges against me – "Mr. Monahan...umm...shouted obscenities at the airport staff...umm... umm...oh, they took some scissors from his suitcase and he became...umm...abusive at this point." If I was reading about it in Kafka I might have found something vaguely amusing in all of it. But I wasn’t. I was there. Living it.

I entered a plea of nolo contendere, explaining to the judge that if I’d been a resident of Oregon, I would have definitely pled "Not Guilty." However, when that happens, your case automatically goes to a jury trial, and since I lived a thousand miles away, and was slated to return home in seven days, with a newborn due in a matter of weeks...you get the picture. "No Contest" it was. Judgment: $250 fine.

Did I feel happy? Only $250, right? No, I wasn’t happy. I don’t care if it’s twelve cents, that’s money pulled right out of my baby’s mouth and fed to a disgusting legal system that will use it to propagate more incidents like this. But at the very least it was over, right? Wrong.

When we returned to Los Angeles there was an envelope waiting for me from the court. Inside wasn’t a receipt for the money we’d paid. No, it was a letter telling me that what I actually owed was $309 – state assessed court costs, you know. Wouldn’t you think your taxes pay for that – the state putting you on trial? No, taxes are used to hire more cops like the officer, because with our rising criminal population – people like me – hey, your average citizen demands more and more "security."

Finally I reach the piece de resistance. The week before we’d gone to the airport my wife had had her regular pre-natal checkup. The child had settled into the proper head down position for birth, continuing the remarkable pregnancy she’d been having. We returned to Portland on Sunday. On Mary’s Monday appointment she was suddenly told, "Looks like your baby’s gone breech." When she later spoke with her midwives in Los Angeles, they wanted to know if she’d experienced any type of trauma recently, as this often makes a child flip. "As a matter of fact..." she began, recounting the story, explaining how the child inside of her was going absolutely crazy when she was crying as the police were leading me away through the crowd.

My wife had been planning a natural childbirth. She’d read dozens of books, meticulously researched everything, and had finally decided that this was the way for her. No drugs, no numbing of sensations – just that ultimate combination of brute pain and sheer joy that belongs exclusively to mothers. But my wife is also a first-time mother, so she has what is called an "untested" pelvis. Essentially this means that a breech birth is too dangerous to attempt, for both mother and child. Therefore, she’s now relegated to a c-section – hospital stay, epidural, catheter, fetal monitoring, stitches – everything she didn’t want. Her natural birth has become a surgery.

We’ve tried everything to turn that baby. Acupuncture, chiropractic techniques, underwater handstands, elephant walking, moxibustion, bending backwards over pillows, herbs, external manipulation – all to no avail. When I walked into the living room the other night and saw her plaintively cooing with a flashlight turned onto her stomach, yet another suggested technique, my heart almost broke. It’s breaking now as I write these words.

I can never prove that my child went breech because of what happened to us at the airport. But I’ll always believe it. Wrongly or rightly, I’ll forever think of how this man, the personification of this system, has affected the lives of my family and me. When my wife is sliced open, I’ll be thinking of him. When they remove her uterus from her abdomen and lay it on her stomach, I’ll be thinking of him. When I visit her and my child in the hospital instead of having them with me here in our home, I’ll be thinking of him. When I assist her to the bathroom while the incision heals internally, I’ll be thinking of him.

There are plenty of stories like this these days. I don’t know how many I’ve read where the writer describes some breach of civil liberties by employees of the state, then wraps it all up with a dire warning about what we as a nation are becoming, and how if we don’t put an end to it now, then we’re in for heaps of trouble. Well you know what? Nothing’s going to stop the inevitable. There’s no policy change that’s going to save us. There’s no election that’s going to put a halt to the onslaught of tyranny. It’s here already – this country has changed for the worse and will continue to change for the worse. There is now a division between the citizenry and the state. When that state is used as a tool against me, there is no longer any reason why I should owe any allegiance to that state.

And that’s the first thing that child of ours is going to learn.

December 21, 2002

Nick Monahan works in the film industry. He writes out of Los Angeles where he lives with his wife and as of December 18th, his beautiful new son.

Copyright © 2002 LewRockwell.com

     

 

Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: policestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: EricOKC
Either we have a choice or we dont. If by refusing the search and leaving the area we become suspect, how exactly is it a "consensual" search again?

In this circumstance, the search is consensual based on the desired access to the boarding gate. When someone turns around AFTER willfully baiting the personnel responsible for maintaining the security of the gate, that amounts to "probable cause."

Also, please note that most airports in this country are ports of entry into the United States, and law enforcement personnel have always had rather wide powers of discretion in the immediate area of a port of entry.

In light of these issues, could you explain to us YOUR position on making English the official language of this nation?

In your case, I'll grant a humanitarian exemption so that it won't be necessary to deport your Biblical Beast of Burden.

901 posted on 12/22/2002 5:49:21 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

Comment #902 Removed by Moderator

Comment #903 Removed by Moderator

To: RGSpincich
I've never seen any such sign before. What if someone who has never flown before, walks up and changes their mind. Has nothing to do with baiting or IQ.
904 posted on 12/22/2002 6:04:50 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC; BigBobber
Actually, the way to begin is by getting the federal government out of the process altogether, and allow the airlines themslelves to have full and absolute discretion over: - who gets to work for them, and who doesn't; - who's allowed to carry a weapon on board, and who isn't; - who's allowed on board at all, and who isn't; - and who gets intensively searched, and who doesn't. If this had been the policy to begin with, I can just about guarantee that the 9/11 attacks wouldn't have happened.
905 posted on 12/22/2002 6:04:58 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

Comment #906 Removed by Moderator

To: EricOKC
Other things that have been suggested, and dismissed by statists like yourself, is arming pilots and/or flight crews, allowing CCW holders to fly armed, 100% baggage scanning, and many other suggestions which focus on solving the problem without regard to any Muslim feelings which may be bruised.

I'm in favor of most of these things. Off-duty police and military should be allowed to carry on planes, with the permission of the pilot. I'm not ready to allow teams of Nation of Islam drones like John Mohammed to board a plane carrying a piece just because they got a CCW somewhere. Are you?

Are metal detectors for passengers allowed in your system? That is a search you know.

You still haven't anwered the question that is the theme of this thread. How do you determine if a woman is really pregnant and not hiding a bomb under that bulge in her belly? Nothing you mention will prevent that.

And this has question has nothing to do with disrobing in public or body cavity searches, so let's not hoist up that straw man again.

907 posted on 12/22/2002 6:07:34 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

Comment #908 Removed by Moderator

To: Poohbah
What would I care about the law at a Port of entry of the US, or need to know, if I just want to travel from Podunk Indiana to Cowtown Kansas.

What's come of this country when a citizen has to know every nuiance of every federal and state law, or risk being a criminal from being a stupid redneck who decides to turn around at a security checkpoint?

909 posted on 12/22/2002 6:10:25 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 889 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I wouldn't have a problem with such a system.
910 posted on 12/22/2002 6:10:27 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies]

Comment #911 Removed by Moderator

To: Xenalyte
So what are you gonna do at airport security if you get frisked? and the frisker described iin the article was a woman.
912 posted on 12/22/2002 6:20:56 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies]

Comment #913 Removed by Moderator

To: EricOKC
I am so sorry they dont like being "baited" but the reality is since i have not attempted entry, and have only been a smart-ass, while it is frustrating, it is neither illegal nor a legitimate reason to detain me.

Sorry, you're wrong.

Sorry you dont like it, but that question was settled back in the 60's.

This wasn't calling a LEO a pig. It was coming up to a controlled-access area with an apparent attempt to enter, followed by sudden departure from same when it became obvious that your effects would be subject to a search.

The courts have held that suddenly making a U-turn when a cop sees you is "probable cause."

One may call a LEO a pig and as long as no objectively threatening actions are made, the cop cant do a damn thing about it without overstepping his authority.

This wasn't calling a LEO a pig.

Contempt of Cop is not a real offense.

This wasn't "contempt of cop."

Not all of them and regardless of that, as long as I have not entered the customs controlled area, your argument is invalid.

They can detain you long enough to verify that you never were in the customs controlled area. That could take a while.

Were that not the case sir, you could argue that a parking fine received for overstaying the meter on airport property is a violation of federal law and should be investigated by the FBI.

There is a significant difference between a parking violation and engaging in behavior that on its face seems to be an effort to evade law enforcement officers.

914 posted on 12/22/2002 6:26:18 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies]

To: Bob Mc
What would I care about the law at a Port of entry of the US, or need to know, if I just want to travel from Podunk Indiana to Cowtown Kansas.

Then don't travel via any international airports.

What's come of this country when a citizen has to know every nuiance of every federal and state law, or risk being a criminal from being a stupid redneck who decides to turn around at a security checkpoint?

Yeah, whatever happened to the good ol' days when people turning and running from the cops AFTER making the cops take notice of you was, like, kEWl dOOd?

915 posted on 12/22/2002 6:28:14 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
So a polite frisk is okay? Or are we ruling out any kind of frisk. And Xena can speak for herself or are we into speaking for her?
916 posted on 12/22/2002 6:29:25 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
I don't regard being screened as submission to authority. I regard it as doing my part of ensure that we are not all murdered on the plane. I regard it as like voting, paying taxes, obeying the law,,the duty of a citizen. But I am a strange person,,I like authority, for the most part I think our government serves us well, I like the President, I respect people who are doing their job. Some people on this thread in my opinion are juveniles with aggressive chips on their shoulders, looking for someone, anyone to accuse of thinking wrong, looking for a fight, paranoic and posiing as constitutionalists and patriots. Some growing up and accepting the burdens of citizenship as well as the rights and freedoms seems indicated to me.
917 posted on 12/22/2002 6:38:35 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
"Then don't travel via any international airports."

I never planned to. Your the one who insisted I look up the law of Port of Entries.

"Yeah, whatever happened to the good ol' days when people turning and running from the cops AFTER making the cops take notice of you was, like, kEWl dOOd?

A stupid redneck realizes he can't go through, never had any intention of harm or breaking the law, tries to turn around (I NEVER POSED THAT HE WAS RUNNING AWAY FROM COPS, DON'T CHANGE MY EXAMPLE) cause he knows he can't go through, and ends up incriminating himself. Probably has charges leveled also depending on what kinds of property of his he has on him.

Still seems like a bum system set up to frame the stupid and innocent.

918 posted on 12/22/2002 6:39:47 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl; Poohbah
Sorry cajungirl, this was for Poohbah.
919 posted on 12/22/2002 6:41:49 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
There is nothing special about off-duty cops or military either unless they both receive some magical power that can only be imparted to them.

Here's the difference. Cops and military are under constant scrutiny by their fellows and their superiors. When they start to act irrationally they aren't allowed to have sharp pointy objects and they eventually get booted out. I don't trust the Nation of Islam to be as cautious.

Now, are metal detectors or other passive screening devices for passengers, say to detect explosives, allowed in your airport? If not, why is baggage screening OK (your previous post) but not passenger screening?

920 posted on 12/22/2002 6:43:07 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 911 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson