Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coffee,Tea,or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell attheAirport?
lewrockwell.com ^ | 12/18/2002 | Nicholas Monahan

Posted on 12/21/2002 11:33:05 AM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham

 

Coffee, Tea, or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wife’s Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell at the Airport and Then Lying About Why We Put You There?

by Nicholas Monahan

This morning I’ll be escorting my wife to the hospital, where the doctors will perform a caesarean section to remove our first child. She didn’t want to do it this way – neither of us did – but sometimes the Fates decide otherwise. The Fates or, in our case, government employees.

On the morning of October 26th Mary and I entered Portland International Airport, en route to the Las Vegas wedding of one of my best friends. Although we live in Los Angeles, we’d been in Oregon working on a film, and up to that point had had nothing but praise to shower on the city of Portland, a refreshing change of pace from our own suffocating metropolis.

At the security checkpoint I was led aside for the "inspection" that’s all the rage at airports these days. My shoes were removed. I was told to take off my sweater, then to fold over the waistband of my pants. My baseball hat, hastily jammed on my head at 5 AM, was removed and assiduously examined ("Anything could be in here, sir," I was told, after I asked what I could hide in a baseball hat. Yeah. Anything.) Soon I was standing on one foot, my arms stretched out, the other leg sticking out in front of me àla a DUI test. I began to get pissed off, as most normal people would. My anger increased when I realized that the newly knighted federal employees weren’t just examining me, but my 7½ months pregnant wife as well. I’d originally thought that I’d simply been randomly selected for the more excessive than normal search. You know, Number 50 or whatever. Apparently not though – it was both of us. These are your new threats, America: pregnant accountants and their sleepy husbands flying to weddings.

After some more grumbling on my part they eventually finished with me and I went to retrieve our luggage from the x-ray machine. Upon returning I found my wife sitting in a chair, crying. Mary rarely cries, and certainly not in public. When I asked her what was the matter, she tried to quell her tears and sobbed, "I’m sorry...it’s...they touched my breasts...and..." That’s all I heard. I marched up to the woman who’d been examining her and shouted, "What did you do to her?" Later I found out that in addition to touching her swollen breasts – to protect the American citizenry – the employee had asked that she lift up her shirt. Not behind a screen, not off to the side – no, right there, directly in front of the hundred or so passengers standing in line. And for you women who’ve been pregnant and worn maternity pants, you know how ridiculous those things look. "I felt like a clown," my wife told me later. "On display for all these people, with the cotton panel on my pants and my stomach sticking out. When I sat down I just lost my composure and began to cry. That’s when you walked up."

Of course when I say she "told me later," it’s because she wasn’t able to tell me at the time, because as soon as I demanded to know what the federal employee had done to make her cry, I was swarmed by Portland police officers. Instantly. Three of them, cinching my arms, locking me in handcuffs, and telling me I was under arrest. Now my wife really began to cry. As they led me away and she ran alongside, I implored her to calm down, to think of the baby, promising her that everything would turn out all right. She faded into the distance and I was shoved into an elevator, a cop holding each arm. After making me face the corner, the head honcho told that I was under arrest and that I wouldn’t be flying that day – that I was in fact a "menace."

It took me a while to regain my composure. I felt like I was one of those guys in The Gulag Archipelago who, because the proceedings all seem so unreal, doesn’t fully realize that he is in fact being arrested in a public place in front of crowds of people for...for what? I didn’t know what the crime was. Didn’t matter. Once upstairs, the officers made me remove my shoes and my hat and tossed me into a cell. Yes, your airports have prison cells, just like your amusement parks, train stations, universities, and national forests. Let freedom reign.

After a short time I received a visit from the arresting officer. "Mr. Monahan," he started, "Are you on drugs?"

Was this even real? "No, I’m not on drugs."

"Should you be?"

"What do you mean?"

"Should you be on any type of medication?"

"No."

"Then why’d you react that way back there?"

You see the thinking? You see what passes for reasoning among your domestic shock troops these days? Only "whackos" get angry over seeing the woman they’ve been with for ten years in tears because someone has touched her breasts. That kind of reaction – love, protection – it’s mind-boggling! "Mr. Monahan, are you on drugs?" His snide words rang inside my head. This is my wife, finally pregnant with our first child after months of failed attempts, after the depressing shock of the miscarriage last year, my wife who’d been walking on a cloud over having the opportunity to be a mother...and my anger is simply unfathomable to the guy standing in front of me, the guy who earns a living thanks to my taxes, the guy whose family I feed through my labor. What I did wasn’t normal. No, I reacted like a drug addict would’ve. I was so disgusted I felt like vomiting. But that was just the beginning.

An hour later, after I’d been gallantly assured by the officer that I wouldn’t be attending my friend’s wedding that day, I heard Mary’s voice outside my cell. The officer was speaking loudly, letting her know that he was planning on doing me a favor... which everyone knows is never a real favor. He wasn’t going to come over and help me work on my car or move some furniture. No, his "favor" was this: He’d decided not to charge me with a felony.

Think about that for a second. Rapes, car-jackings, murders, arsons – those are felonies. So is yelling in an airport now, apparently. I hadn’t realized, though I should have. Luckily, I was getting a favor, though. I was merely going to be slapped with a misdemeanor.

"Here’s your court date," he said as I was released from my cell. In addition, I was banned from Portland International for 90 days, and just in case I was thinking of coming over and hanging out around its perimeter, the officer gave me a map with the boundaries highlighted, sternly warning me against trespassing. Then he and a second officer escorted us off the grounds. Mary and I hurriedly drove two and a half hours in the rain to Seattle, where we eventually caught a flight to Vegas. But the officer was true to his word – we missed my friend’s wedding. The fact that he’d been in my own wedding party, the fact that a once in a lifetime event was stolen from us – well, who cares, right?

Upon our return to Portland (I’d had to fly into Seattle and drive back down), we immediately began contacting attorneys. We aren’t litigious people – we wanted no money. I’m not even sure what we fully wanted. An apology? A reprimand? I don’t know. It doesn’t matter though, because we couldn’t afford a lawyer, it turned out. $4,000 was the average figure bandied about as a retaining fee. Sorry, but I’ve got a new baby on the way. So we called the ACLU, figuring they existed for just such incidents as these. And they do apparently...but only if we were minorities. That’s what they told us.

In the meantime, I’d appealed my suspension from PDX. A week or so later I got a response from the Director of Aviation. After telling me how, in the aftermath of 9/11, most passengers not only accept additional airport screening but welcome it, he cut to the chase:

"After a review of the police report and my discussions with police staff, as well as a review of the TSA’s report on this incident, I concur with the officer’s decision to take you into custody and to issue a citation to you for disorderly conduct. That being said, because I also understand that you were upset and acted on your emotions, I am willing to lift the Airport Exclusion Order...."

Attached to this letter was the report the officer had filled out. I’d like to say I couldn’t believe it, but in a way, I could. It’s seemingly becoming the norm in America – lies and deliberate distortions on the part of those in power, no matter how much or how little power they actually wield.

The gist of his report was this: From the get go I wasn’t following the screener’s directions. I was "squinting my eyes" and talking to my wife in a "low, forced voice" while "excitedly swinging my arms." Twice I began to walk away from the screener, inhaling and exhaling forcefully. When I’d completed the physical exam, I walked to the luggage screening area, where a second screener took a pair of scissors from my suitcase. At this point I yelled, "What the %*&$% is going on? This is &*#&$%!" The officer, who’d already been called over by one of the screeners, became afraid for the TSA staff and the many travelers. He required the assistance of a second officer as he "struggled" to get me into handcuffs, then for "cover" called over a third as well. It was only at this point that my wife began to cry hysterically.

There was nothing poetic in my reaction to the arrest report. I didn’t crumple it in my fist and swear that justice would be served, promising to sacrifice my resources and time to see that it would. I simply stared. Clearly the officer didn’t have the guts to write down what had really happened. It might not look too good to see that stuff about the pregnant woman in tears because she’d been humiliated. Instead this was the official scenario being presented for the permanent record. It doesn’t even matter that it’s the most implausible sounding situation you can think of. "Hey, what the...godammit, they’re taking our scissors, honey!" Why didn’t he write in anything about a monkey wearing a fez?

True, the TSA staff had expropriated a pair of scissors from our toiletries kit – the story wasn’t entirely made up. Except that I’d been locked in airport jail at the time. I didn’t know anything about any scissors until Mary told me on our drive up to Seattle. They’d questioned her about them while I was in the bowels of the airport sitting in my cell.

So I wrote back, indignation and disgust flooding my brain.

"[W]hile I’m not sure, I’d guess that the entire incident is captured on video. Memory is imperfect on everyone’s part, but the footage won’t lie. I realize it might be procedurally difficult for you to view this, but if you could, I’d appreciate it. There’s no willful disregard of screening directions. No explosion over the discovery of a pair of scissors in a suitcase. No struggle to put handcuffs on. There’s a tired man, early in the morning, unhappily going through a rigorous procedure and then reacting to the tears of his pregnant wife."

Eventually we heard back from a different person, the guy in charge of the TSA airport screeners. One of his employees had made the damning statement about me exploding over her scissor discovery, and the officer had deftly incorporated that statement into his report. We asked the guy if he could find out why she’d said this – couldn’t she possibly be mistaken? "Oh, can’t do that, my hands are tied. It’s kind of like leading a witness – I could get in trouble, heh heh." Then what about the videotape? Why not watch that? That would exonerate me. "Oh, we destroy all video after three days."

Sure you do.

A few days later we heard from him again. He just wanted to inform us that he’d received corroboration of the officer’s report from the officer’s superior, a name we didn’t recognize. "But...he wasn’t even there," my wife said.

"Yeah, well, uh, he’s corroborated it though."

That’s how it works.

"Oh, and we did look at the videotape. Inconclusive."

But I thought it was destroyed?

On and on it went. Due to the tenacity of my wife in making phone calls and speaking with relevant persons, the "crime" was eventually lowered to a mere citation. Only she could have done that. I would’ve simply accepted what was being thrown at me, trumped up charges and all, simply because I’m wholly inadequate at performing the kowtow. There’s no way I could have contacted all the people Mary did and somehow pretend to be contrite. Besides, I speak in a low, forced voice, which doesn’t elicit sympathy. Just police suspicion.

Weeks later at the courthouse I listened to a young DA awkwardly read the charges against me – "Mr. Monahan...umm...shouted obscenities at the airport staff...umm... umm...oh, they took some scissors from his suitcase and he became...umm...abusive at this point." If I was reading about it in Kafka I might have found something vaguely amusing in all of it. But I wasn’t. I was there. Living it.

I entered a plea of nolo contendere, explaining to the judge that if I’d been a resident of Oregon, I would have definitely pled "Not Guilty." However, when that happens, your case automatically goes to a jury trial, and since I lived a thousand miles away, and was slated to return home in seven days, with a newborn due in a matter of weeks...you get the picture. "No Contest" it was. Judgment: $250 fine.

Did I feel happy? Only $250, right? No, I wasn’t happy. I don’t care if it’s twelve cents, that’s money pulled right out of my baby’s mouth and fed to a disgusting legal system that will use it to propagate more incidents like this. But at the very least it was over, right? Wrong.

When we returned to Los Angeles there was an envelope waiting for me from the court. Inside wasn’t a receipt for the money we’d paid. No, it was a letter telling me that what I actually owed was $309 – state assessed court costs, you know. Wouldn’t you think your taxes pay for that – the state putting you on trial? No, taxes are used to hire more cops like the officer, because with our rising criminal population – people like me – hey, your average citizen demands more and more "security."

Finally I reach the piece de resistance. The week before we’d gone to the airport my wife had had her regular pre-natal checkup. The child had settled into the proper head down position for birth, continuing the remarkable pregnancy she’d been having. We returned to Portland on Sunday. On Mary’s Monday appointment she was suddenly told, "Looks like your baby’s gone breech." When she later spoke with her midwives in Los Angeles, they wanted to know if she’d experienced any type of trauma recently, as this often makes a child flip. "As a matter of fact..." she began, recounting the story, explaining how the child inside of her was going absolutely crazy when she was crying as the police were leading me away through the crowd.

My wife had been planning a natural childbirth. She’d read dozens of books, meticulously researched everything, and had finally decided that this was the way for her. No drugs, no numbing of sensations – just that ultimate combination of brute pain and sheer joy that belongs exclusively to mothers. But my wife is also a first-time mother, so she has what is called an "untested" pelvis. Essentially this means that a breech birth is too dangerous to attempt, for both mother and child. Therefore, she’s now relegated to a c-section – hospital stay, epidural, catheter, fetal monitoring, stitches – everything she didn’t want. Her natural birth has become a surgery.

We’ve tried everything to turn that baby. Acupuncture, chiropractic techniques, underwater handstands, elephant walking, moxibustion, bending backwards over pillows, herbs, external manipulation – all to no avail. When I walked into the living room the other night and saw her plaintively cooing with a flashlight turned onto her stomach, yet another suggested technique, my heart almost broke. It’s breaking now as I write these words.

I can never prove that my child went breech because of what happened to us at the airport. But I’ll always believe it. Wrongly or rightly, I’ll forever think of how this man, the personification of this system, has affected the lives of my family and me. When my wife is sliced open, I’ll be thinking of him. When they remove her uterus from her abdomen and lay it on her stomach, I’ll be thinking of him. When I visit her and my child in the hospital instead of having them with me here in our home, I’ll be thinking of him. When I assist her to the bathroom while the incision heals internally, I’ll be thinking of him.

There are plenty of stories like this these days. I don’t know how many I’ve read where the writer describes some breach of civil liberties by employees of the state, then wraps it all up with a dire warning about what we as a nation are becoming, and how if we don’t put an end to it now, then we’re in for heaps of trouble. Well you know what? Nothing’s going to stop the inevitable. There’s no policy change that’s going to save us. There’s no election that’s going to put a halt to the onslaught of tyranny. It’s here already – this country has changed for the worse and will continue to change for the worse. There is now a division between the citizenry and the state. When that state is used as a tool against me, there is no longer any reason why I should owe any allegiance to that state.

And that’s the first thing that child of ours is going to learn.

December 21, 2002

Nick Monahan works in the film industry. He writes out of Los Angeles where he lives with his wife and as of December 18th, his beautiful new son.

Copyright © 2002 LewRockwell.com

     

 

Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: policestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: Libertarian Billy Graham
lewrockwell.com

Just keep shoveling that horse doodoo, boys. I know you'll find a pony under the pile sooner or later.

521 posted on 12/21/2002 6:51:24 PM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
All of this undoubtedly doesn't rustle a Norman Minetta feather. His 60" interview with Steve Croft was indeed a classic in PC lunacy. Best wishes to the Grahams.
522 posted on 12/21/2002 6:52:03 PM PST by gabby hayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
An armed citizen would act.... the question is whether it was smart to put him there armed. I don't know.

Well, we run all over town armed. I drive up and down I-75 armed. I am armed at home, at the mall sometimes, in crowded and lonely situations. Is being armed in a plane inherently different from any other crowded situation?

I suppose some extra training on just what not to hit (besides other innocents, of course) might be necessary, since a plane does have some additional vulnerabilities. But otherwise, the situation isn't all that different from carrying at the local mall.

523 posted on 12/21/2002 6:57:57 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
This guy really sounds like he has some serious anger problems.

I have flown trans-Atlantic from Ireland to North America twice this year.
Flying solo, I automatically assumed, made me a questionable target for security. And I was right.
First time out I had my baggage checked.

Second time I was body searched (this time in Heathrow..because I couldn't fly direct out of Dublin...so as an Irish citizen, I almost always expect to be checked in London).
I had a small black woman feel my breats, butt, wazooo up looking for something or other. I just stood there and asked her polietly if she could hurry up because I had a connection to make. *L*

Maybe if I start taking some herbs and camomile tea etc., I may become more concerned about evasiveness on my person, and be affronted.

Personally, I don't mind them doing that kinda stuff to me, because the plane I'm travelling on won't be blown up by suicide (possibly pregnant and still suicidal) bombers.
524 posted on 12/21/2002 7:00:04 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer
It is different than a mall, because we are not often attacked in that crowded of a situation.
525 posted on 12/21/2002 7:00:53 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Chico
Flying in the last tri-mester is generally not recommended for good reasons.

I was thinking the same thing. In Ireland, where I live, you are not allowed on a flight if you are in the third tri-mester of pregnancy. (Before you ask about the right of a mother to choose her travel plans this is Ireland! *S* We don't allow abortion either! *S*)

526 posted on 12/21/2002 7:04:00 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Goodness - over 500 posts now. We need to sue the Portland airport for all the time they've cost us. Thanks for the note.

I think most of us are willing to suffer through tighter security. I usually give the airport guys a running play by play -or more of a color commentary. But I think most of us find abuse of authority infuuuuuuuurrrriating --much to our credit.

I particularly find it irritating (but amusing) when I run into one of those real Barney Fife types -- usually the source of family stories for years.

Time to finish last night's burrito.
527 posted on 12/21/2002 7:04:45 PM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
Answer the question: What would you think of the TSA and Homeland Security then?

I would think that they couldn't have done anything to stop what happened 9/11.

How is Homeland Security going to catch the bad guys?

528 posted on 12/21/2002 7:05:13 PM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
It is different than a mall, because we are not often attacked in that crowded of a situation.

Perhaps not, but I wasn't speaking of the probability of an incident so much as the actual function of shooting/acting if the situation arose. In actuality, except for one day in 2001, we haven't had any really nasty incidents involving airplanes. Until 9/11, it really wasn't something a reasonable person would consider.

Of course, if the terroristic ones get the chance, the mall may not be such a far-fetched target. Israel is a good example.

529 posted on 12/21/2002 7:07:43 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
Welcome to the new Amerian Police state..unless you are an illegal sneaking across our border you are suspect
530 posted on 12/21/2002 7:07:50 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
When I see "Lewrockwell.com" the post loses all credibility.

Why?

531 posted on 12/21/2002 7:12:42 PM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Of course, if the terroristic ones get the chance, the mall may not be such a far-fetched target. Israel is a good example.

You are right.

532 posted on 12/21/2002 7:13:02 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 529 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
So we called the ACLU, figuring they existed for just such incidents as these. And they do apparently...but only if we were minorities. That’s what they told us.

If they were minorities, they never would've been searched at the airport to begin with.

533 posted on 12/21/2002 7:20:42 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
All the Federale could write was that he didn't like how the man "exhaled". You can see that as a "tantrum"; I see it as the reasoned response of an American citizen. WHy aren't these clowns bothering potential terrorists, not Americans. Each time they check someone like me or you, they are not checking Mohammed Atta.
534 posted on 12/21/2002 7:25:25 PM PST by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
"Personally, I don't mind them doing that kinda stuff to me, because the plane I'm travelling on won't be blown up by suicide (possibly pregnant and still suicidal) bombers."

IF that was true, it might be worth it, but it isn't. The security in place is a JOKE. It's not going to stop anybody with a plan, support to put the plan into action, and the cool head and cold heart necessary to make it work.

The only way for us to be safe again is to kill the people who would do this. It's going to take a world war. Somebody squeezing some breasts on pregnant women in Oregon is NOT contributing one bit to national security. That our government is LYING to us about this, on the big picture and the small...is TERRIFYING to me.

Whether this guy is lying or not is not really important. It's that our government has taken away our rights for the sake of a sham like this and people are DEFENDING it that matters.
535 posted on 12/21/2002 7:25:37 PM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Rye
Airport security was a giant scam before 9-11.

It is only slightly less so today.

Too bad the feds can't put PC on the back burner.

It will take another 9-11 to bring the point home.

Unless all of the major airlines go bankrupt first.

Betwen the unions and the elimination of the casual traveler, commercial aviation may be finished as we knew it.

536 posted on 12/21/2002 7:29:45 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
All the Federale could write was that he didn't like how the man "exhaled". You can see that as a "tantrum".

Even our writer admits to doing more than that, and he is telling his best story.

Each time they check someone like me or you, they are not checking Mohammed Atta.

They are doing both, I believe that.

537 posted on 12/21/2002 7:30:56 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: TaZ
You must be kidding...I had a pocket knife confiscated in LAX way back in 1980...what airports were you flying out of?

Nope, not kidding. I flew bazillions of miles 1970-2000. All major airports in the US and some overseas. Being in the line of work I am, I am very familiar with FAA security regulations. Sure, a lot of airport screeners would try to confiscate a pocket knife for any of many reasons. Some probably just collected nice knives. But they had no authority to do it. They got away with it anyway. If you quote the FAA Reg No. to the supervisor, and make them look it up, you get to keep your knife. I used to do it a lot when I had extra time between flights.

Now I don't fly anymore (unless Uncle makes me and pays for it.) I refuse to contribute to the farce.

538 posted on 12/21/2002 7:32:10 PM PST by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
...the elimination of the casual traveler, commercial aviation may be finished as we knew it.

The FedGov seems incapable of comprehending that casual travelers - without whom the airline industry would quickly go bankrupt - would start returning in droves if two conditions were met: 1) Racial profiling (Arab/Islamic looking people obviously getting the full treatment), and 2) The screening of ALL check-in baggage (as opposed to the current 5% - 10%).

If these conditions were met, folks like the ones in this article would no longer be frightened of being fondled and/or jailed, and would feel (and be) a helluva lot safer to boot. But PC trumps everything nowadays. Everything.

539 posted on 12/21/2002 7:57:54 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: AK2KX
the state is your enemy. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.

So, when I put on my USAF uniform on Monday morning and I go to work on C-130 aircraft electrical systems, then I am the enemy? I am an idiot? You are so far off base man. I thought Arab terrorists were the enemy.

I owe no allegiance to the Feds, in fact the only thing I do owe them is my utter contempt.

Show me your utter contempt and I'll show you the hot lead of my 9 mm. Show my family your utter contempt and I'll show you the hot end of a shotgun. I am an American patriot and your words are no better than the hatred that the enemy shows us!

540 posted on 12/21/2002 8:25:46 PM PST by gcraig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson