Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ewing
I think Pete Rose's name should be permitted on the HoF ballot, but only in the first year after his death. His stats have earned his place there, but his scurrilous gambling habit should deprive him of the personal glory the HoF induction would provide.
9 posted on 12/21/2002 9:05:21 AM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
Interesting take.
12 posted on 12/21/2002 9:09:31 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski
I think Pete Rose's name should be permitted on the HoF ballot, but only in the first year after his death. His stats have earned his place there, but his scurrilous gambling habit should deprive him of the personal glory the HoF induction would provide.

The problem, here, is that the banning is not just a punishment for Pete Rose, but also a deterrant to every other player who comes after.

Keeping Pete Rose out Baseball and out of the Hall of Fame has been the most honorable thing that has occurred in Baseball in decades. It's the one standard that hasn't been eroded.




14 posted on 12/21/2002 9:18:39 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson