Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
It wasn't though, if I understand Guth correctly. There are processes and the time spans and volumes are small but never zero.

Really?

Being a smart-aleck, the next question I'm likely to ask is "What happened before that?"

94 posted on 12/20/2002 12:07:37 PM PST by Oberon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Oberon
Being a smart-aleck, the next question I'm likely to ask is "What happened before that?"

That assumes that a "before" can exist. When time periods get small enough, the very nature of before and after make no sense because on uncertainty principles.
100 posted on 12/20/2002 12:15:10 PM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: Oberon
Being a smart-aleck, the next question I'm likely to ask is "What happened before that?"

BB Cosmology involves the idea that space AND time come into existence concurrently at t=0. Therefore, by definition, there is no such thing as t<0. Hence, there is no "before" the BB, as the word "before" presupposes the ability to establish temporal order, and if there is no "time" then there can be no temporal order.

The standard way of illustrating this is to use the analogy that asking what is "before" the BB is like asking what is North of the North pole, or what is colder than absolute zero.

121 posted on 12/20/2002 2:01:23 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson