To: sitetest
It appears that, unlike Mr. Gore, and Mr. Clinton, Rev. Jackson, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Nunn, Sen. Frist has gone from a mostly pro-abort position to a mostly pro-life position. I'll take that any day.
Ill take it in one of 51, not in the leader of the 51. That is a big difference.
I recall one. Sen. Hatch. I was quite bitterly disappointed in his failure to support life in this area.
Yeah, pretty close.
Nonetheless, the pulling of a lever marked (D) will not occur through the efforts of my fingers.
Nor through mine. I vote every time, and I vote pro-life. That never means Democrat, never means green, etc. However, it does not always mean Republican.
patent +AMDG
534 posted on
12/20/2002 3:17:49 PM PST by
patent
To: patent
Dear patent,
"Ill take it in one of 51, not in the leader of the 51. That is a big difference."
You may have misunderstood what I said. Messrs. Gore, Clinton, Kennedy, and Nunn, as well as the Rev. Jackson, all were once pro-life. They "evolved" and became pro-aborts.
Sen. Frist appears to have started out as pro-abort, and has seemingly changed to a pro-lifer.
Are you saying that's unacceptable?
If so, why?
Also, I really haven't found any evidence yet that HCA is really pro-abort. In fact, the only evidence I can find seems to indicate that the company has had a preference not to permit abortions in its facilities, when it has a choice.
I'm open-minded, but I need to see some evidence of the accusations.
sitetest
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson