Its a STATE issue. The Supreme Court had no constitutional authority to even hear the Roe v. Wade decision in the first place. Did that stop them?
If they won't accept a constitutional prohibition against exercising their Jurisdiction, do you think they will accept an act of Congress? Heck no. They'll just declare the act of congress to be unconstitutiuonal.
Congress can't change the situation. We need to appoint judges who adhere to the original intent of the drafters of the Constitution. This is not going to happen any time soon, no matter who we elect as ML.
In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.