[Nitro]

According to ABC News correspondent Brian Ross

This is the most surprising item in the story...

it's not like we didn't know clintoon and reno were dirty!!

[gov_bean_ counter]

Remember some investigative report a few months ago by another of the networks? The one about the FBI agent who became chief of security for the twin towers. That story always implied the guy was held back by Reno, but never mentioned her by name. They got right up the the waters edge, then chickened out.

[okie01]

According to ABC News correspondent Brian Ross

"This is the most surprising item in the story..."

Amen to that. The rest is old news to FReepers.

But it begs the question: Will the mainstream media follow-up the story, attempting to discover why the Reno Justice Department quashed any action against suspected terrorists?

If they do, they'll probably arrive at a point where they have to ask themselves, "Was the Clinton administration undermining investigations into terrorist activity because they were afraid the investigations would lead back to Oklahoma City? And reveal a cover-up designed to serve a political purpose, rather than the truth that we had been attacked by a foreign terrorist group?"

Personally, I'm not holding my breath.

[Log]

Of course the original ABC article said nothing about Reno or Clinton. The only hint was a reference to the mid 1990's. The typical ABC news consumer wouldn't have this information highlighted for them as did Newsmax for us.

[Mo1]

According to ABC News correspondent Brian Ross

This is the most surprising item in the story...

That was my thought ..