Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats plan to use Lott gaffe to push civil rights agenda in Congress
Associated Press / SFGate

Posted on 12/18/2002 5:08:34 PM PST by RCW2001

JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, December 18, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/12/18/national1732EST0727.DTL

(12-18) 16:53 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

Whether Trent Lott stays or goes, Democrats and civil rights groups see his apparent nostalgia for a segregated past as a golden opportunity to revive a hate crimes bill, push a minimum wage increase and force the White House to tilt new tax cuts toward minorities and the poor.

They predict the sudden Republican sensitivity to racial issues will continue whether or not Lott stays on as GOP Senate leader in the next Congress, when the party will control both houses.

"Trent Lott is the cue stick by which we engage in our game of billiards," said Rev. Joseph Lowery, former head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and president of the Black Leadership Council.

Democrats predicted a new civil rights spotlight on their rivals.

"Republicans have to prove, not only to us, of course, but to the American people that they are as sensitive to this question of racism, this question of civil rights, this question of equal opportunity, as they say they are," Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle told CNN. "But whether or not they truly are depends on who they nominate, what actions they take, how they vote."

Lott ran into trouble Dec. 5 at a 100th birthday party for Sen. Strom Thurmond, who ran for president as a segregationist in 1948. Lott said people in Mississippi were proud to have voted for Thurmond at the time, adding, "if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years either."

He since has apologized repeatedly, but GOP officials have sounded increasingly eager to usher Lott off the leadership stage, worried that the race-based controversy would affect their ability to increase the party's share of the black vote.

Lott has refused to step down, saying he can do more to atone as Senate Majority leader.

Democrats say the issues that Lott may have helped them push include an expansion of hate crimes legislation to cover sexual orientation, which Republicans blocked this year; a minimum wage increase; national legislation banning racial profiling; reform of death penalty laws, which activists say is used against minorities more than anyone else; and AIDS funding, especially for Africa.

Consideration of any of those issues would have been unlikely in a Republican-controlled Congress.

Democrats are also looking at bringing up more affirmative action programs, which Lott said he supports. "I do feel that affirmative action is necessary and essential as we try to bring people of all backgrounds religions and races into the mainstream in America to have opportunity," Lott told ABC on Tuesday.

Democrats are particularly looking at proposing educational affirmative action to ensure university and college admissions are fair to minorities and first-generation college-goers, officials said.

"I think it would be good to have a leader who now believes in affirmative action and will take steps to make sure that affirmative action programs are implemented in every aspect of our lives," said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Even the Republican bedrock issue -- tax cuts -- will be affected by the Lott controversy, Democrats say. One Democratic aide, speaking anonymously, said Democrats plan to take him up on pushing tax policies that are beneficial to low-income Americans.

A Democratic House member, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said he relished the idea of Lott staying as Senate Majority leader or even as just a senator, saying the gaffe opened the door for all kinds of Democratic legislation.

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: RCW2001
A shotgun blast to the faces of these race pimps right out of the chute would have prevented stories like this!

Instead, Lott, Bush, and the conservatives ran for the tall grass.

White guilt is an ugly thing to watch.

21 posted on 12/18/2002 5:30:12 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLAUSA
Yeah, I remember Clinton saying (in his last State of the Union) that he wanted to make the Earned Income Tax Credit REFUNDABLE. That made my jaw drop.

The only other tax to play with is the payroll tax, but that would truly be stealing from Social Security, which the Democrats won't do, or they will do and try to blame the Republicans for it.

-PJ

22 posted on 12/18/2002 5:31:38 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
I would not put much faith in Bush holding up to these folks.

Even before this he's refused to defend the borders, push school choice and been vague on quotas.

Bush will go along to get along (and re-elected). Truth is as Mark Levine said on a local radio program this AM, Bush had failed to follow through on these issues long before the Lott affair. Little chance then he will do so now.
23 posted on 12/18/2002 5:35:00 PM PST by Douglas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
" Instead, Lott, Bush, and the conservatives ran for the tall grass.

Crying at the same time,"Mommy,Mommy,someone called Trent a bad word,make him go away!!" But,now I see opportunity. Every word out of Tren'ts mouth will be scrutinized and reported. Send Trent out to give speeches on vouchers, economic enterprise zones,the benefits of tax decreases,etc. While everyone will be waiting for him to utter a Byrdism, a few might actually become enlightened.
24 posted on 12/18/2002 5:36:27 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Do you really think Delay and Hastert would pass such laws in the House.

My thoughts exactually, well said.........

25 posted on 12/18/2002 5:39:16 PM PST by jdontom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Dump Lott, then we can go back to business as usual.

You're being naive. The Dem plan is to demonize GOPers one by one. They probably would have started with Ashcroft, but Schrum found these 'tasty" remarks by Lott. Everyone at the party knew what he meant, but taken out of context, they sound good for the Dem side. And Lott is not an adept sidestepper, to say the least.
The GOP has a choice - stick with Lott, and face it now, or dump Lott and wait to see who they go after next.

And if the GOP doesn't call a halt to these assassinations at some point, they will continue until no one is left standing.
Because that's the way the Dem party machine works.

26 posted on 12/18/2002 5:39:32 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Ha. Reparations will now be on the 'front burner' set to full boil.

Troubling thing is, the way GWB likes to 'throw money' at problems, this may just be another 'line item' to him.

27 posted on 12/18/2002 5:39:46 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
This is probably the wrong forum to ask this, but ...

Does anyone know any politician that spoke/met/praised/etc. with the Nation of Islam? (Klinton - either one, Congressional Black Caucus members - Waters)

Aren't they the true modern segragationalists?
28 posted on 12/18/2002 5:41:05 PM PST by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FLAUSA
Earned Income Tax Credit

I think he meant the question rhetorically.

29 posted on 12/18/2002 5:42:26 PM PST by winin2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Douglas
On the other hand, Bush has been reaching out to minorities, just different minorities. I may not like some of the things that he's done, but one upcoming change in race relations will be that it's not black/white, but anything/white or ultimately anything/anything. The Hispanic bloc is the latest growth demographic. If Republicans claim more of that group, they'll be in good shape since Blacks are maxed out.

Soon, Blacks will have to contend with the growth in Asian and Hispanic influence, and they won't be able to blame Whites for it. Their civil rights language will apply (and be applied?) to all, and they'll only have themselves to blame for being left back.

Right from the start, I said that the Lott issues was going to boil down to Lott standing his ground against baseless opportunistic attacks from Democrats lest they be emboldened to reach for more, but then Republicans will deal with Lott on their own terms. Now, we're down to haggling over the terms.

-PJ

30 posted on 12/18/2002 5:43:25 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Perhaps they'd like something to go with their "whine":



Regards, Ivan

31 posted on 12/18/2002 5:43:53 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winin2000
True, but I do remember being speechless when Clinton suggesting making the Earned Income Tax Credit refundable. That would be true income redistribution through the tax code.

-PJ

32 posted on 12/18/2002 5:45:35 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
You're being naive. The Dem plan is to demonize GOPers one by one.

So what? We're always being charged with that crap. It won't stick.

I'm being no more naive than you are, and apparently want to do exactly the same thing: Dump Lott, then vigorously defend ourselves against these bogus charges. They WILL go away because they have no substance. Have faith.

33 posted on 12/18/2002 5:46:23 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"I think it would be good to have a leader who now believes in affirmative action and will take steps to make sure that affirmative action programs are implemented in every aspect of our lives," said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus.

I cannot believe this nightmare. Is this really happening? Is this what I (and so many others) stayed up until 3am every night making GOP campaign commercials and for six months being away from from my children to elect Republicans? FOR THIS???

Trent Lott should not be merely defeated. He should be strung up by his testicles on the floor of the Senate and whacked like a pinata with machetes by the caucus and campaign staff for every winning campaign this year.

I hate this scumbag. I do so despise this maggot.

34 posted on 12/18/2002 5:51:25 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
In light of this Lott fiasco, there is no doubt in my mind that if Cheney's health is no good, Connie Rice will be Bush's 2004 running mate.
35 posted on 12/18/2002 5:53:01 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Welcome to FR........


36 posted on 12/18/2002 5:54:31 PM PST by jdontom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: montag813
don't 'hold back' now...release is good! ;)
37 posted on 12/18/2002 5:55:14 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"Civil Rights" - I could have sworn this debate was already fought and won. Did I miss something in the last 40 years?

Perhaps someone would like to tell me what right whites have that blacks don't. Perhaps I could use that special "whites only" right to my advantage. You never know when one of those extra "rights" could come in handy.
38 posted on 12/18/2002 5:55:59 PM PST by thedugal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Trent Lott now says he supports 'affirmative action'. Two weeks ago he seemed to say he supported a segregationist Dixiecrat in 1948 instead of the Republican candidate, Dewey. By going from segregation to affirmative action he exchanged one form of racism for another.

How about another principle? All people deserve equal rights before the law regardless of their race or ethnic background. Just being a human being qualifies each person for their fundamental human rights ,"as endowed by their creator."
39 posted on 12/18/2002 5:56:41 PM PST by MarkM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
"making the Earned Income Tax Credit refundable."

It is refundable, if you qualify you can get a check from Uncle Sam.

"That would be true income redistribution through the tax code"
Would be? It is
40 posted on 12/18/2002 5:57:02 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson