Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats: A Lott of trouble (ANN COULTERS VIEWS ON TRENT LOTT ATTACK)
worldnetdaily ^ | 12/18/2002 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 12/18/2002 3:51:50 PM PST by TLBSHOW

Democrats: A Lott of trouble

I'm just glad Strom Thurmond isn't around to see this.

Statisticians believe Trent Lott is now on track to break Bill Clinton's single-season record for public apologies. During his recent B.E.T. appearance, Lott said he supported affirmative action, regretted voting against the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, and that he'd give "The Bernie Mac Show" another try.

What the Lott incident shows is that Republicans have to be careful about letting Democrats into our party. Back when they supported segregation, Lott and Thurmond were Democrats. This is something the media are intentionally hiding to make it look like the Republican Party is the party of segregation and race discrimination, which it never has been.

In 1948, Thurmond did not run as a "Dixiecan," he ran as a "Dixiecrat" – his party was an offshoot of the Democratic Party. And when he lost, he went right back to being a Democrat. This whole brouhaha is about a former Democrat praising another former Democrat for what was once a Democrat policy.

Republicans made Southern Democrats drop the race nonsense when they entered the Republican Party. Democrats supported race discrimination, then for about three years they didn't, now they do again. They've just changed which race they think should be discriminated against. In the 1920s, the Democratic platforms didn't even call for anti-lynching legislation as the Republican platforms did.

Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party was not the only extremist spin-off from the Democratic Party in 1948. Henry Wallace, formerly FDR's vice president and agriculture secretary, left the Democratic Party that year to form the communist-dominated and Soviet-backed "Progressive Party." Much as Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party was expressly pro-segregation, Wallace's Progressive Party was expressly pro-Soviet.

Indeed, this was the apex of Moscow-directed subversion of U.S. politics. The Progressive Party platform excluded even the mildest criticism of Soviet aggression. It will come as no surprise that many American celebrities supported Wallace. The Progressives received 1 million votes nationwide, about the same as Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party.

Thurmond went on to reject segregation, become a Republican, and serve his country well as a U.S. senator. By contrast, running a communist-dominated presidential campaign was Wallace's last hurrah. Yet only an off-the-cuff remark at a birthday party praising Thurmond's presidential campaign is the career-destroyer. Not so fawning references to Wallace's Soviet-backed presidential campaign.

Just two years before Lott's remarks, a hagiographic book on Wallace's life was released, titled "American Dreamer." How about a book about a segregationist titled "American Dreamer"? Wallace's version of the American "dream" was communism every bit as much as Strom Thurmond's dream was segregation. Aren't dreams of murderous dictators, gulags and death camps at least comparable in evil to segregated lunch counters?

The dust jacket on "American Dreamer" featured a nauseating statement of praise by U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy. Kennedy said that the book deserved "to be read by all who care about the American dream." The American dream: communist totalitarianism. Why wasn't the lecherous liberal asked to retire for his flattering remarks about a proven Soviet fifth columnist?

In 1999, the Clinton administration dedicated a room at the Agriculture Department to Wallace. At the dedication, former Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern gave a speech explicitly praising Wallace's pro-Soviet positions, such as the idea that the Cold War was "overdone" and that "problems" between the nations "could not be resolved by military means."

McGovern fondly recalled that he himself had voted for Wallace. He chipperly reminded the audience that he had run for president in 1972 "on a similar platform" – with the help of a young Yale law school graduate named Bill Clinton. Inasmuch as Trent Lott was in kindergarten in 1948, he did not vote for Thurmond. He did not run on a "similar" platform to the Dixiecrats. He did not write a jacket-flap endorsement calling a segregationist an "American Dreamer."

The idea that Lott took the occasion of an old timer's birthday to introduce a new policy initiative to bring back segregation – a Democrat policy – is ludicrous. Lott is a fine fellow; he just has some sort of liberal-Tourette's syndrome that makes him spout Democrat ideas at random. A few years ago, Lott practically wanted to give the adulterous Air Force pilot Kelly Flinn a silver star for her service. Remember that?

Up until two weeks ago, conservatives were clamoring for Lott's removal precisely because of his annoying habit of saying dumb things. (Showing their inferior intellect, liberals have only recently figured that out.) Republicans should ask Lott to step down as leader, but only for all the nice things he's said about Teddy Kennedy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Offer!

Ann Coulter's newest blockbuster is here! "Slander" hammers liberals who use lies to vilify their opponents. Autographed copies now available through WorldNetDaily's online store!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ann Coulter, well-known for her television appearances as a political analyst, is an attorney and author. Dubbed "one of the 20 most fascinating women in politics" by George magazine, Coulter has appeared on ABC's "This Week," "Good Morning America," NBC's "Today," "Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher," CNN's "Larry King Live" and CNBC's "Rivera Live."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; trentlott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 541-546 next last
To: McGavin999
GREAT SUMMATION POST BUMP #255
261 posted on 12/18/2002 6:56:53 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
Inasmuch as Trent Lott was in kindergarten in 1948, he did not vote for Thurmond. He did not run on a "similar" platform to the Dixiecrats. He did not write a jacket-flap endorsement calling a segregationist an "American Dreamer."

The idea that Lott took the occasion of an old timer's birthday to introduce a new policy initiative to bring back segregation – a Democrat policy – is ludicrous.

Ann Coulter


262 posted on 12/18/2002 6:58:48 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

Comment #263 Removed by Moderator

To: alnick
"Lanny Davis was defending him on H&C a little while ago.:-)"

The RAT memo last night must have been


"Billdo: Get Your Licks In Now, We're Shutting Down This Act For A Later Time" and "ALL OTHER RAT SHILLS: RETREAT, RETREAT...WE'VE GONE TOOOOO FAR....RETREAT!"

264 posted on 12/18/2002 6:59:50 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What? Oh, it's you..."cut and paste spam artiste".

Annnnddddd... volley bump!
265 posted on 12/18/2002 7:01:30 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: visualops
Hahaha okay.
266 posted on 12/18/2002 7:01:45 PM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
He was still in kindergarten when he was 7?
267 posted on 12/18/2002 7:02:51 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Sawool
"Lott is representative of the Republican Party in the minds of liberals"

IMHO, they are expecting him to go and will remember that he's gone...and the GOP and conservatives did what was right!
268 posted on 12/18/2002 7:03:23 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You don't miss a thing, do you?
269 posted on 12/18/2002 7:03:38 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
don't worry thread killing is what this is all about by you and van. Cool at least people at FR now know what you 2 are.
270 posted on 12/18/2002 7:03:43 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
All due respect but I simply responded to his initial posts....slowly he grew frustrated because he was obviously off point. I didnt kill anything. I was accused of calling every Lott defender a racist.

Nobody else stepped up in rebuke of HNH so by default I had to respond.

Sorry though. :o)
271 posted on 12/18/2002 7:04:24 PM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"He was still in kindergarten when he was 7?"

Yeah, it's been one of those nights! LOL!!
272 posted on 12/18/2002 7:04:51 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Sawool
The problem is: Lott is representative of the Republican Party in the minds of liberals. With blacks in tow, they will continue to play the race card even if Lott is on longer Majority Leader. If they can't point the finger at Lott, Nichols will do, so will Selby or McConnell, or..... It won't matter who is in the position, southern Senators are ripe for the accusation

Nope sorry I must disagree. Maybe the next person who is Senate Majority leader within the next few days will have a couple billion more brain cells and less ego than Lott.

Once Lott is gone, no more story. Time to move on and give the new Senate Majority Leader a chance.

273 posted on 12/18/2002 7:06:13 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Close enough, but that is a point for the liberals.

They have never gotten out of kindergarten
274 posted on 12/18/2002 7:06:28 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What? Oh, it's you....

Annnndddddd...fake set bump
275 posted on 12/18/2002 7:06:54 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Rats have never gotten out of kindergarten.
276 posted on 12/18/2002 7:07:16 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
I guess that's why credits transfer better from North to South, than South to North. The schools were better.

-PJ

277 posted on 12/18/2002 7:07:40 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
so yout party is filled with commies and racist don't ya love it. LOL
278 posted on 12/18/2002 7:08:14 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4; hole_n_one
Well, I thought you both bogied (for you hole_n_one :) and I...I...I just hope we can all....just get past it!...LOL!!
279 posted on 12/18/2002 7:08:41 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Lanny Davis was defending him on H&C a little while ago.:-)

Me am Bizarro!

-PJ

280 posted on 12/18/2002 7:09:04 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson