Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marauder
This is not the Cold War. It's far worse.

Disagree.

A full-scale nuclear exchange with the USSR would have resulted in the complete destruction of the US and the killing of the vast majority of Americans.

Terrorists have nothing anywhere near the capability, and won't develop it anytime soon.

They can hurt the US badly, but they cannot destroy it.

2 posted on 12/18/2002 10:04:21 AM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Restorer
Reason this is worse than the cold war:

There's no MAD right now. They can hit us without concern for their homelands. Until we make it clear, seriously clear, that we will destroy the islamic world if another attack happens we are in a very dangerous situation.
3 posted on 12/18/2002 10:05:58 AM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Restorer
Disagree with the disagree (sort of).

I believe the "terrorists" (a broad group) has 30 nuke "briefcases" that will "arrive" without the 30 minute warning we "enjoyed" with the USSR ICBMs (not sub based). With no MAD capability to respond.

This makes their use more possible, the situation more dangerous, and our response less sure. And the world's response to a "tactical nuke" being used (regardless of who, if anyone, takes credit) is very unpredictable and dangerous.
4 posted on 12/18/2002 10:17:12 AM PST by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson