Replies

I think you REALLY misunderstood this article. Mr. Boortz is mouthing the DU socialism line to make a point.

Well, I may not be the brightest light, but I just re-read the article, and I still see his point differently than you do. So, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

No, you are not the brightest light, in fact it may even be generous to consider you a dim bulb. You have made no logical argument to support a position you have only inadequately stated. You instead assume that you are intellectually superior to everyone here and probably 90% of the world’s population. You then discount the positions of others based on the "fact" that they are mentally inadequate to hold an opinion. This makes you feel good and victorious. You have no useful skills so you invent a reality where its all someone else’s fault. Human nature.

When given rock solid proof supporting the opposing position you simply state "My beef is not with you". Shouldn’t we expect much more of someone who touts them self as a college instructor?

I’ve found that the people who rage at the misuse of Shakespeare are the ones who tend to overuse his prose. They also tend to believe that no one who disagrees with them are mentally qualified to even think about Shakespeare much less write it down. Oh, that we could have endowed Shakespeare with eternal life. The wonderful tragic plays he could have written on the subject of socialism.

What this all boils down to is that your mind is not capable of the higher thought process that is mandatory to understand where boortz is headed with his article. Therefore you wrap your mind around much smaller pre-packaged theories like socialism. Don’t feel bad though, your economic/social belief structure also substitutes as a religion. You see, you get two for the low price of one.

Please disprove the following comment.

Socialism does not create wealth, it consumes it.

My proof of the above statement can be seen through history and current conditions. (ex. Sweden or country in Europe)

please correct the the following in my previous post.

(ex. Sweden or country in Europe)

should read

(ex. Sweden or any country in Europe)