I have tried to explain to Darlin' and others that the article written in the Bergen Record was an article not written about abortion and was written to Highlight Bill Martini, a former congressman in the area, R-8th, 1994-1996. The article went on to list the 4 other judicial appointees.
Martini's pro-abortion record is straight forward as I posted his profile from CNN and the Christian Coalition Score Card where he stated he was pro-choice (abortion) and that he voted to pay for abortions for federal employees overseas and voted for gay rights in the military.
The 4 other candidates were confirmed as abortionists by the NJ Right to Life and the "NJ Pro-Life" Legal Center for the Defense of Life. I think the lawyers for the Legal Center for the Defense of Life know a little bit more about NJ Lawyers than Bush and Darlin'. These lawyers interact with each other daily for years and years and I am sure the Legal Center for the Defense of Life know a bit more as to which lawyers are pro life and which are not.
This link explained the rationale for why pro aborts were picked for NJ.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/794020/posts?page=9#9Martini's pro-abortion record is straight forward as I posted his profile from CNN and the Christian Coalition Score Card where he stated he was pro-choice (abortion) and that he voted to pay for abortions for federal employees overseas and voted for gay rights in the military. The 4 other candidates were confirmed as abortionists by the NJ Right to Life and the "NJ Pro-Life" Legal Center for the Defense of Life. I think the lawyers for the Legal Center for the Defense of Life know
Sounds quite reasonable to me, and both NJ Right to Life and the "NJ Pro-Life" Legal Center for the Defense of Life are reputable, honest pro-life organizations.
So where's the beef, Darlin'?