Replies

I don't think it will help to criticize the black caucus unless there is a issue worth fighting over. Lott respects differences of opinion, so he would be lying if he said what you suggested.

It will be interesting to hear what he has to say on BET tomorrow. I hope he does well with the expected questions and I am sure you will see what is truly in his heart.

See 138, I understand he does not want to bash especially at this time but I really believe this was his train of thought and outright honestly kindly explaining the difference in the RIGHT AND THE LEFTS ISSUES, would explain-quickly and easily.

I can think of no other out for him. He will be marked a right winger, or racist he must explain or he is doomed in the senate-PERIOD.

I really believe this is what he was thinking when he said the statement-and it is now hard to explain politically now w/out looking like what you say- bashing.

Lott does respect 'differences of opinion' but you are saying he respects socialisim/communisim/ "the progressive caucus"? I don't think so.

He indeed would not be lying. (I saw the look on Lott's face and his body language on a C-Span press conference when a Al Sharpton follower was attacking him) with words; Lott clearly pointed out the SHARPTON affiliation and moved on with disgust and complete disrespect)

No one is stupid enough to make this statement that Lott made. (especially when they are in the spotlight as a new ML!) This is a McCauliffe/Carville dream of a set up??? It is too bizarre. So if he would be lying to explain how I have explained I see this as no other feasible reasoning of an explanation and that he is a racist, is he? Do you have knowlege of this?

Do you have any other explanations other than he is racist with a capitol R?