Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
I agree that the scenario you came up with, would have been much better than what he did say.

The fact is, it was a light hearted party for the old man, and not the floor of the Senate. The critical appraisal of the changes in the south would have had no place at a birthday event.

This thing has gotten way too much attention for what it was not.

It was not a endorsement of segregation. A past reality that has been or should be all but forgotten.

Segregation has not been a political issue since the 60s. Lott simply forgot that someone might dredge it up as a issue. That is all there is to it!

123 posted on 12/15/2002 11:41:36 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: wirestripper
The fact is, it was a light hearted party for the old man, and not the floor of the Senate. The critical appraisal of the changes in the south would have had no place at a birthday event.

My script wasn't critical, and Thurmond is known to bask in such praise. He's disavowed his Dixiecrat past often and for decades. There is no sting there for him.

Segregation has not been a political issue since the 60s. Lott simply forgot that someone might dredge it up as a issue. That is all there is to it!

Unfortunately, it was Lott that dredged it up.




133 posted on 12/15/2002 11:50:01 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson