Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: habs4ever
You are 100% correct in your assessment of Nickles. This is a craven, opportunistic, move by a man who has always wanted to be Majority Leader. He would be a poor ML as shown by his lack of loyalty and tact.

After seeing Mitch McConnell this morning, I am greatly impressed by this man. He also wants to be ML, but unlike traitor Nickles has not taken advantage of this opportunity to advance himself. He also said that if a centure vote was put forth against Lott he would introduce one against all Senators who have made racially insensitive comments (Byrd). HOORAY!!!

We truly are the Stupid Party if we do not follow McConnell's lead. Lott has apologized several times and is not a segragationist. The double standard is appalling. The Rats response to questions regarding Byrd's comments are "well he is not the Majority Leader." No, he's only President Pro-Tem and in the line of succession!!! We need to throw this back at them and ask "well, if he was the Majority Leader would you then ask for Byrd to step down over his comments?"

220 posted on 12/15/2002 8:06:24 AM PST by SoCar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: SoCar
Lott's problem is that WITHOUT all the recent controversy, he is a WEAK and INEFFECTVE Majority Leader. If he had been strong in the past, Republicans would be lining up to support him.
225 posted on 12/15/2002 8:08:56 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

To: SoCar
Lott has clearly revealed that he cares only about Trent Lott. An honorable man would resign rather than resort to craven and obviously insincere apologies.
265 posted on 12/15/2002 8:20:14 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson