To: habs4ever
This is a very craven move by Nickles, demonstrating how personally ambitious he is as a pol. I agree and disagree. This is Nickles whole career here. He has built himself up this high in politics and he has thrown the big dice over this issue. If Lott beats him, Nickles' career is over. If Nickles wins, he is a front runner for 2008. Nickles was a wonder boy. Elected to the Senate at age 31 in 1980. He is 52 now will be 58 in 2008... I am guessing that he feels that 2008 will be around the right time to find out if he has what it takes to grab the brass ring.
To: dogbyte12
Yes, it is a huge gamble by him, where he is throwing away the Budget Committee to become a majority leader? Does he have what it takes to be such an effective leader? I doubt it.Not by doing it this way.
He could have showed his effectiveness and clout and ability to compromise by steering the Budget Committee, proving his worth to the WH and building coalitions, and giving Lott a chance to succceed or fail on his major tests such as passing a significant tax cut.This could have waited until June.He shows me that he lacks the patience to pick his spots.And people have the temerity to call Lott arrogant and ambitious?
To: dogbyte12
If Nickles wins, he is a front runner for 2008. No Senator has been elected president in 42 years.
This isn't about 2008; it's about taking advantage of an opportunity NOW.
Nickles is not presidential material, now or ever.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson