Replies

Clinton's been absent because he claimed the Dems did not have a "destruction machine" like the Republicans do. HA. The next time he shows his face I hope somebody asks him about his non-existant destruction machine. I'm quite sure they would ask him, so don't look for him for a while.

The liberals have been complaining for months that the W administration has had a hard-on to take out Saddam and made clames that W has looked no further than that goal.

I don't believe that.
I'm sure many plans have been made about how we will run that country when Saddam is gone.
It is just not politically smart to tell everyone how we want the Iraq government set up...think about it for a minute and I'm sure you think of several reasons.

I believe many republicans don't like Lott and have used this issue to try and get him replaced with a "real conservative." The fact that they have strong allies on the 'rat side has not bothered them in the least. They must believe that the 'rats think Lott is too moderate and are happy to help us get a "real conservative" in the ML possition...'cause they think they can deal easier with a "real conservative."

It looks like the "real conservatives" didn't think about what would happen when Lott was removed. They think that loyalty to the party only works one way. They think politician are not human.

I think Lott will walk if he is forced to step down.I blame the "real conservative destruction machine."
Republican control in the Presidency Senate and House doesn't happen frequently.
Maybe I should to drink the kool-aid now and avoid the rush.