Replies

I hate the way that Lott has managed to let the Dems dump their 20th century sins (the party of segregation and quotas on the GOP.

Lott cannot remain as Majority Leader -- not because he is a racist, but because he is a moron.

Quick -- show of hands.

1. All the Freepers that think Lott is a brilliant Majority Leader.

(Gee -- talk about an underwhelming response!)

2. All the Freepers that posted comments hoping that Lott would be replaced -- or simply hoped that someone else would be Majority Leader in the week following the November elections.

(Hmmmm. . . . quite a few. . . )

3. All the Freepers that think agree with Lott's comment (that if a segregationist big-government Democrat -- that is what the Dixicrats were) won in 1948 would have avoided the problems we had in the late 20th century).

(Don't overwhelm me folks. Do I need to wait longer to see a hand up?)

4. All the Freepers that moaned about Lott getting named ML, that think he is at best a mediocre ML, that were appalled by his comment at Thurmond's birthday party, but now feel he should continue as ML because the Dems want him out?

(Wow! And I use to wonder why they called the GOP the Stupid Party.)

Folks, the straw that breaks the camel's back ain't necessarily the heaviest one. The party that reflexively opposes a position taken by the other party -- even if that position can help their own party -- is supposed to be the Dems, not the GOP. The back bench is a fine place for Trent.

You're right. You've convinced me. Let's give leadership of the Senate back to the dem's so they won't call all of us racists anymore.

(I've never wondered a minute why the pub's are called The Stupid Party.)
"Here, hold muh beer, Trent. Watch me shoot this apple off muh foot."