To: chiller
Here's the best part of Mark's piece, imho:
"For the best part of two centuries, the Democrats have been the party of race: In the 19th century, they were for slavery; in the 20th, for segregation; in the 21st, for the neo-segregation of ''affirmative action,'' ''hate crimes'' and all the other paraphernalia of the modish trickle-down apartheid determined to make racial categorization a permanent feature of the American landscape. "
3 posted on
12/15/2002 6:37:15 AM PST by
chiller
To: chiller
Here's the best part of Mark's piece, imho . . . I agree. That was the best paragraph. This whole thing is absolutely ridiculous. It makes me sick that no one, especially Republicans, can just say anything, anymore, without have to make sure they every "t" has been crossed, every "i" has a dot, without being crucified by the immoral, hypocritical, divisive, NAACP, Rats, ACLU, the Rat Black Caucus, which, IMO, try to read and scream "rascisim" into everything.
40 posted on
12/15/2002 10:55:59 AM PST by
nicmarlo
To: chiller
"Here's the best part of Mark's piece, imho:"For the best part of two centuries, the Democrats have been the party of race: In the 19th century, they were for slavery; in the 20th, for segregation; in the 21st, for the neo-segregation of ''affirmative action,'' ''hate crimes'' and all the other paraphernalia of the modish trickle-down apartheid determined to make racial categorization a permanent feature of the American landscape. " Yeah. Amazing how he can wrap up in two sentences wha it takes folks from the Heritage Foundation six years of position papers to say. Really.
106 posted on
12/15/2002 8:18:36 PM PST by
leilani
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson