To: EternalVigilance
Yes, but that's not the reason they don't want Nickles. They want Lott right where he is. With Lott there, they get a twofer. They can roll Lott and don't have to deal with Nickles.
47 posted on
12/14/2002 5:17:17 PM PST by
BlueCat
To: BlueCat
Yes, but that's not the reason they don't want Nickles. They want Lott right where he is. With Lott there, they get a twofer. They can roll Lott and don't have to deal with Nickles. Oh, I totally get it.
As you say, his opinion speaks volumes about what would be best for the Republican Party and conservatism about now.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson