Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Yes, but that's not the reason they don't want Nickles. They want Lott right where he is. With Lott there, they get a twofer. They can roll Lott and don't have to deal with Nickles.
47 posted on 12/14/2002 5:17:17 PM PST by BlueCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: BlueCat
Yes, but that's not the reason they don't want Nickles. They want Lott right where he is. With Lott there, they get a twofer. They can roll Lott and don't have to deal with Nickles.

Oh, I totally get it.

As you say, his opinion speaks volumes about what would be best for the Republican Party and conservatism about now.

50 posted on 12/14/2002 5:20:00 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson