To: Bluntpoint
Yes, he's a moron and, actually it's odd that I would wind up defending the guy because to tell you the truth I hate Trent Lott.
But, as to the other points: The potential tanking of the SC and our agenda, that's what I was curious about.
998 posted on
12/14/2002 8:10:56 AM PST by
Jhoffa_
To: Jhoffa_
I think we are more at risk in losing our momentum with Trent where he is.
Trent is not a bridge. He is an obstruction.
If Trent wants to run away like a baby because he can't be in charge of the school prom, then I don't care. He can open his own little beauty shop and bitch and moan to his fem clients how he was wronged.
History, will not look kindly on girly boy Trent if he steps down from the senate and provides an opening for the Dems.
To: Jhoffa_
"The potential tanking of the SC and our agenda, that's what I was curious about."
What if I told you he's already accomplished that now, if he a)stays or b)leaves the Senate. That's my honest, heart felt, visionary take on this. We have one option now, c). He steps aside as leader when challenged, gets his face of the party poster, and fights on, rejecting charges that he's a racist at every damn turn with all of the rest of us on the attack against the overt racists, that are even racists in their legislating. That's one thing Lott hasn't done to my knowledge.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson