Replies

"So, for all of you who want Lott to go, you'd better think long and hard about it. Because if he goes, all the advances we made in November aren't worth crap."

Hey Ms Intense!

IMO, the Lott already insured that when he, yet again, yearned for the 'opportuntities lost in 1948' of the then Dixiecrat 'Thurmond the segragationist' just a week ago.
Unfortunately, it appears the RATS have enough ammo on the 90s CCC-card-toting (that the Lott lied about), Dixiecrat-mentored, politically tone-deaf Limpa-Lott (notice I didn't mention his segragationist activities of college from 40 years ago).

Now, there will be communist, RAT-festering legislation posing as being civil rights sensitive that no one will dare vote against, including Bush.

Lott was, is and always will be, now moreso than ever, a major liability as a leader of the party. He singlehandedly has taken the sting of out the RATS loss for them, as only he knows how to do.

Funny how one dumbass comment can knock down the house of cards, huh?

But after seeing Sharpton last night on H&C, I am convinced this isn't about a racist comment, especially since this is a party who believed and forgave Clinton and fought against impeachment. Make no mistake. This is about power. The Dems lost it and want it back. So either the Dems get their wish and Lott resigns the Seante- and they ultimately win, or the Republicans stand and fight against this obvious power play.