To: Sabertooth
1.) When you speak at someone's 100th birthday party in front of hundreds of friends and colleagues, you talk nice about the person turning 100. I'm not saying you distort reality, but you give the person a compliment or two. Like Lott said, he only wanted "to honor Strom Thurmond the man... What are you going to say, 'I wish you lost'?"
2.) Sean Hannity interviewed Lott on his radio show the other day. You can listen to it on www.hannity.com if you haven't already heard it. Lott said that when he thinks of the Strom Thurmond of 1948, he thinks of "strong national defense, economic development, balanced budgets, and opportunity and [that's what I was referring to in the speech]."
Maybe he was misunderstood. Misunderstandings happen all the time; we apologize and try to be clearer next time. There is no reason to tar and feather Lott for a simple misunderstanding, especially when we have people like Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still hasn't renounced a former membership with the KKK.
To: panther33
Lott said that when he thinks of the Strom Thurmond of 1948, he thinks of "strong national defense, economic development, balanced budgets, and opportunity and [that's what I was referring to in the speech].
That's a load of crap! Lott would have preferred the Republican Dewey if that was the case. There was absolutely no other reason the Dixiecrats existed other than to stop integration, none. That's an indisputable historical fact - and Lott is lying when he says otherwise.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson