Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
Why should Bush stand up for Lott when Lott sat around for four days with his finger up his ass instead of nipping this thing in the bud

Because Bush had already accepted the FIRST apology. I am accused of being the premier BushBot around here and for good reason but I don't take to cowardly statements of support that are in fact designed to appease the unappeasable. If Bush had included his repudiation of the same virulent racism of today and the democrats success at keeping blacks on the plantation by letting 13% of the population drive every domestic program for 50 years his statement would have accomplished something. It is about time for an accounting of the 6 trillion dollars and special legislation aimed specifically at blacks and what the result has been.

755 posted on 12/13/2002 10:42:45 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies ]


To: Texasforever
Because Bush had already accepted the FIRST apology.

No he didnt. All the talk shows tonight were quoting multiple White House sources including Rove that the reason the President came out and criticized Lott yesterday was because Lott had told Bush he was going to do a real apology on Larry King but he couldnt get the words out. Bush was reportedly furious at Lott's first two or three non apologies.

809 posted on 12/13/2002 11:07:40 PM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies ]

To: Texasforever
It is about time for an accounting of the 6 trillion dollars and special legislation aimed specifically at blacks and what the result has been.

The explosion of Rap and Hip Hop, from what I can gather.

842 posted on 12/13/2002 11:37:11 PM PST by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson