To: sinkspur
So if he can't be captain he'll take his toys and go home.
This kind of hand-it-to-the-Dems stupidity is why we need to write off Lott as a lost cause.
Weak-kneed spoiled cheerleaders -- who needs 'em?
To: petuniasevan
I think I would call his bluff I were the POTUS.
14 posted on
12/13/2002 7:35:25 PM PST by
the_doc
To: petuniasevan
I asked one of my employees today what she would do if I demoted her from management to filing clerk. She got real pi$$ed off. Then she realized I was making a point. She sure would have quit if I had been serious.
190 posted on
12/13/2002 8:10:23 PM PST by
GWfan
To: petuniasevan
This kind of hand-it-to-the-Dems stupidity is why we need to write off Lott as a lost cause. Right. If the Dems are going to have it handed to them, then let it be now, rather than have Lott rolling over on every controversial issue, Judicial appointment, etc. That's what he did for his Southern Brother Clinton.
1,027 posted on
12/14/2002 8:45:42 AM PST by
bimbo
To: petuniasevan
Its all about power not the country..not you , not me ...it is all about them..that is why they are giving the country away
To: petuniasevan
This kind of hand-it-to-the-Dems stupidity is why we need to write off Lott as a lost cause. This is exactly why Lott has proven to be such an ineffective leader in the past. His number one priority is himself, not the conservative cause, and not us.
It's beginning to emerge that the reason he made his remark about how the country would have been better off if Strom Thurmond had been elected President is because Lott has no idea what Thurmond stood for. In fact, the whole idea of 'standing for' something is probably alien to Lott.
To: petuniasevan
This kind of hand-it-to-the-Dems stupidity is why we need to write off Lott as a lost cause.I'd say you are describing the hapless W. and his "brilliant" advisor, Rove.
1,126 posted on
12/17/2002 8:44:41 PM PST by
BenR2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson