To: WatchNKorea
Sadly, the GOP via the Lott just handed the RATS their old-new issue and this won't go away. The potential for good with the Lott, even leading the Majority, was slim to begin with because of the Lott's nature. It could be argued that the GOP would get more done with a slim minority, consider the near-longer term agenda, with a minority and no Lott. Lott seems to do better when we're in the minority anyway. He's more comfortable there, 'holding the line' with the minority excuse, than leading. He's a HORRIBLE, STUPID, INEPT leader with RAT tendencies.
To: ApesForEvolution
Sadly, the GOP via the Lott just handed the RATS their old-new issue and this won't go away.
Yea, the old issues worked Real well on Nov 5th, didn't they ? I hope this emboldens them to go even farther to the left of where they are already headed. Lay back, relax, W can control Lott from the bullypulpit, what is everybody so worried about ?
To: ApesForEvolution
That was then.Bush is in the WH, and somehow, managed to get back a majority.He sets the agenda and Lott goes to work.Bush is the LEADER, not Lott, so stop fretting over Trent's shortcomings as his job isn't be bold and have "guts".Bush will do that.
A smart ape like you should have seen that by now.Do you understand Lott's job description, or would you rather bloviate?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson