To: dogbyte12
We need a running list of reasons not to just the Lott from a conservative, Constitutionist perspective.
1 - The Lott abrogated his responsibilities because he was 4 votes short, as it stood, in the Senate during xxxlinton's Impeachment trial.
2 - The Lott bent over to the RATS and brought a new 'power-sharing' arrangement to the Senate
3 - The Lott wed himself to the infamous xxxlinton triangulator
4 - The Lott incredibly brought us all back to the good old days of segragation and even suggested that had the politics of the Dixiecrats won, we would all be better for it.
Next?
To: ApesForEvolution
5. But for Lott, we would not be having this corrosive debate today.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson