Yes, you're wrong in your understanding of my post. I really don't see how I could make it any clearer than I did the first time, so you might try a re-read:
"No reading of Christian texts can amount to a Divine mandate for violence in the service of the Gospel."
I would not dispute with you that many have attempted to serve the Gospel through violence; I only make the case that the foundational text doesn't support it. Unlike the case with Islam.