Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alloysteel
It always troubled me, the language referring to a "Well-regulated Militia" followed by "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

The first clause is just some fluff setting out one reason why the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, but it in no way modifies the second clause. Think of it this way. Rewrite the sentence as, "Thomas Jefferson has a nice dog, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

The first clause in no way modifies the meaning of the second clause.

18 posted on 12/13/2002 7:53:56 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: RogueIsland; alloysteel
I like this example also:

"A well educated citizenry being neccesary to the survival of a free nation, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed."

Use this example on liberal gun grabbers, and ask them how this can be used to mean that only properly qualified universities and schools and other goverment authorized educators should be allowed the "collective right" to own or read books.

33 posted on 12/13/2002 10:34:55 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson