You suddenly have a lot of "pals" around here who disagree with you.
Why don't you try not issuing orders to defend things "in detail" to the "second and third-order effects."
I'm not posting an article. I'm posting comments to one. How about telling me where I'm wrong with my basic statements?
Besides, how can we debate the second- and third-order effects of an Administration that never existed. (All would be speculation.)
Finally: Are you a liberal? You seem to exude an air of moral superiority in this discussion. What makes you so superior? Because you are able to look down your nose at Lott?
No. I am a conservative Republican who has put up with Lott's ineptitude for six frickin' years.
You seem to exude an air of moral superiority in this discussion. What makes you so superior?
Because I am morally superior to someone who consistently sabotages Republican efforts, and to those who suddenly decide to defend him.
Because you are able to look down your nose at Lott?
No, my moral superiority comes from understanding the nature of moral duties--and one of those duties is to competently execute the tasks of those posts I volunteer to serve in. If I find that I am unable to perform them, I merely step down from the post or posts in question.
It's an exceedingly simple concept.
And it has completely eluded the mental grasp of The Vacant Lott.