[VaBthang4]

Haha...I noticed that earlier...

It is funny how a particularly sensitive topic will attract people to interject their personal obsessions into it regardless of the lack of association. I have been waiting for someone to claim that the motive behind sacking Lott is actaully driven by his personal knowledge of the Oklahoma City Bombers true identity or that he knew who shot down TWA flight 800.

I got lambasted last night [on this thread] by some guy who seemd to pontificate that because I think Lott should go...I must hate Asian-Americans.

ROTFLOL

Oi...

[LS]

As I've said many times on this issue, my only concern with removing Lott as MAJORITY leader is, "Should we do the right thing for the wrong reason?" If we give in, it will not solve anything in terms of the "ammunition" issue. But it would solve a big problem in terms of having a "nut-cruncher" as Maj. Leader.

Is the one worth the other? I'm torn. One day I say yes, the other I say no. EVERYONE must know that removing Lott would NOT in any way silence the left, who would think they have an "issue" here. But, on the other hand, it turns out removing Gingrich was a pretty good deal. It took away a demon and left us with a very quiet, but quietly effective, Speaker of the House.