Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wimpycat
If the kid's birth was at age 15, underage intercourse began then at age 14, or even younger.
18 posted on 12/12/2002 9:48:49 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
How did you arrive at that conclusion?
28 posted on 12/12/2002 10:05:00 AM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"If the kid's birth was at age 15, underage intercourse began then at age 14, or even younger."

Logical fallicy. Nine months of preganancy and 12 months at age 15? It is possible she was 15 before underage intercourse began. Unlikely perhaps, but sloppy logic annoys me.

42 posted on 12/12/2002 11:37:39 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson