Posted on 12/11/2002 11:08:13 PM PST by kattracks
Well said!
With all respect, of course it is.
If we don't have more Republicans in the Senate, then Daschle---and not the President---sets the agenda.
It's ALWAYS about political power.
I can't help but wonder what Webster Harris Jr. would have made of Trent Lott. Harris, who died suddenly last week at the age of 67, was one of Milwaukee's most prominent black Republicans. As chairman of the Milwaukee County Election Commission, he oversaw much of the turbulent dealings connected to the Milwaukee County recall movement earlier this year. For those who knew him well, Harris was also known as a staunch Republican activist who encouraged other blacks to take advantage of opportunities for advancement inside the GOP. It wasn't an easy sell. Finding an authentic black Republican in some black communities is only a bit more rare than encountering a black Eskimo. Basically, most blacks vote Democratic, the party they feel speaks most directly to their needs. When the leading Republican in the Senate makes an unfortunate "slip of the tongue" in support of racial segregation, can you blame them? Speaking at a 100th birthday celebration for retiring Sen. Strom Thurmond, Lott said these now-infamous words: "I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. "And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either." Thurmond, of course, ran for president in 1948 as a Dixiecrat on a platform calling for the continuation of segregation in the South. Apparently, in 2002, Senate Majority Leader Lott harbors a fond nostalgia for the days of Jim Crow. Harris, although faithful to his party, would have been disheartened by this latest blemish on the GOP's image with blacks. I used to tease Harris about his party loyalties whenever we ran into each other, most often at Mr. Perkins Family Restaurant, a soul-food place on the north side. My favorite taunt was to quote the father of retiring congressman J.C. Watts, a black conservative from Oklahoma. When asked about his son's political leanings, the senior Watts reportedly answered: "Black folks voting for the Republican Party is like a bunch of chickens voting for Col. Sanders!" The line always made Harris laugh. But he never wavered in his main belief; black folks needed to support the Republican Party for several reasons, not the least of which was preventing Democrats from taking the black vote for granted. For almost 20 years, I used Harris as a source for stories concerning the continuing struggle of the GOP to recruit more blacks to the ranks. That proved to be harder than one would think, considering that polls reveal many African-Americans actually support conservative issues like school prayer, welfare reform and the death penalty in their private lives. Those similarities beg the question: Why don't more blacks vote Republican? Which brings us back to Republicans like Trent Lott. Black voters may share some ideals, but they're not going to share a party with people they feel don't really accept them as human beings. Typically, Lott tried to explain away his comments as "a poor choice of words conveyed to some the impression that I embraced the discarded policies of the past." He forgot to mention he was quoted as saying almost exactly the same thing about Thurmond almost 22 years ago! Add to that Lott's appearance before a white supremacy group called the Council of Conservative Citizens in 1999, and it's hard to accept the Mississippi congressman's words as just a slip of the tongue. More like some inner truth escaping while he wasn't paying attention. Webster Harris was a black Republican who loved black people. Even blacks who disagreed with his politics respected him, because they knew where he was coming from. He might have voted for the occasional Col. Sanders, but only as a way to keep blacks from putting all their eggs in the same basket. www.jsonline.com Return to regular view
Original URL: http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/dec02/102641.asp
Harris would have been dismayed
Last Updated: Dec. 11, 2002
Eugene Kane
E-MAIL | ARCHIVE
|
Huh? So this is why the DemocRATs won't let go of this? They're holding onto this out of a sense of moral righteousness?
Please, in politics all things are political. ESPECIALLY among DemocRATs.
As far as the conservatives who have come out against Lott...well, I do think they believe it is the right thing to do.---But, let's not forget that Pat Buchanan acted purely on his sense of what was the "right thing to do" in 1992...and he ended up helping to introduce the Clintonian virus to the American soul.
We're neck deep in polictics and that means we must...THINK!
Right again, Dan. I have been wondering how this thing could be such a big deal as well. Though I'd shed no tears if Lott stepped down, I stand, no- I sit in utter amazement at the hypocrisy shown by his critics.
It is also beyond comprehension how a man's words mean what his critics say they mean, not actually what he says they mean. That is, of course, a phenomenon that only exists from Left to Right and never the reverse. Completely incomprehensible!
If the government schools had not abandoned the task of education 40 years ago, we might have witnessed a little more intellectual analysis of the situation. As it is, all you need are a couple of functioning glands to be a pundit.
A leader he isn't - a vote for the Pubbies he is. Can he be both and survive?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.