kAcknor Sez:
Absolutely not! Lott should be "sacrificed" because of the multiple spinal-spheroidalectomys that had failed to give him anything resembling a backbone and noticeable male genitalia. I thought that maybe the last one had finally taken when I heard he had called for troops on the borders during an O'Reily interview, but alas, nothing came of it.
Rush had a caller today that made sense. The 'rats may not wish him totally gone, just wounded badly. They know they can "roll" him on just about any issue so why trade that for somebody who may be more effective? Most of us know that we would be better off with a stronger Senate Leader; it's the "why" of the matter that sticks. I don't like the reason at all. But it's a case of life giving us lemons, and dam*it, I'd rather have lemon-aid.
"yIQeqQo' neH, DoS yIqIp!" (Don't just aim, hit the target!)