Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Selective Moral Outrage, Part II: Why only be outraged at Lott’s remarks?
National Review Online ^ | 12/11/02 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 12/11/2002 11:55:55 AM PST by wcdukenfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Diverdogz
Hmmm...an article from Human Events states that Thurmond fought against and successfully got rid of the poll tax as Governor:

Because of his "Dixiecrat" race for President in 1948 and his steadfast opposition to civil rights legislation that included speaking for 24 hours and 18 minutes on the Senate floor (the record for filibusters) in opposition to the 1957 Civil Rights Act, it has been easy for the national media to characterize Thurmond as a racist. In truth, just like more liberal Southern senators such as J. William Fulbright (D.-Ark) and John Sparkman (D.-Ala), Thurmond did defend the segregationist practices of Southern states against what he deemed "a new kind of police state centered in Washington." But he was not a hater of the Bilbo stripe and, while governor from 1946-50, successfully sought the abolition of the poll tax and more funds for black, albeit segregated, schools. Link.

He also fought at Normandy (Bronze Star, Purple Heart...15 other medals), was a judge, governor, state and fed. Senator...the only U.S. Senator in American history to win a write-in vote - and helped elect S. Carolina's very first Republican Senator - Phil Gramm - many years later.

Those S. Carolinians who loved Strom Thurmond, sent him to the statehouse and Washington, were mostly Democrats. Strom spoke at the Dem. convention in 1948. Trent's early Mississippi political upbringing was typical of the south - Democratic and racist. Let's talk party and race and American history....the real story. The "Radical Republicans" were murdered along with the freed slaves they helped defend in the pre-Civil War south. The Republican Party was formed to help fight slavery and prevent its expansion westward.

Or let's talk perspective and priorities of a nation. The press ignores the serious work Sen. Thurmond did to strengthen our national defenses in the 80s, or his mentoring of young leaders, his humility, his servant heart. If Strom, like Sen. Byrd, had remained a Democrat, there would be an annual "Thurmond week" on the History Channel and every American child would learn about this American hero...apology long since accepted.

42 posted on 12/11/2002 1:29:27 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Caliban
Right on. Thank you very much.
43 posted on 12/11/2002 1:32:45 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
bump
44 posted on 12/11/2002 1:40:49 PM PST by Outraged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Bump for later reference.
45 posted on 12/11/2002 1:42:06 PM PST by k2blader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump
46 posted on 12/11/2002 1:48:30 PM PST by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; FreeTheHostages
If you look at real History and not revised history you will see many who fought against the federal government on the segregation issue were not necessarily racist.

They were fighting not to keep the black man down but to insure a limited Federal Government and to maintain States Rights.

That intention was not wrong (States Rights), it may have been poor timing and may not applied to segregation (I think the Constitution in plain in this regard and the States have no right to limit the rights of certain races), but you cannot say all of those fighting were racist.
47 posted on 12/11/2002 1:55:14 PM PST by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
Hello. Um, everyone knows that. That's not what anyone is talking about. No one in this thread is suggesting that Sen. Lott is a racist. That's a given here.
48 posted on 12/11/2002 1:59:07 PM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
I say to all the 'Rat critics of Lott: Define a standard to judge him by. But just remember the synchronistic coincidence in this context, that "standard" also means "petard".

Because we're going to hoist you mothers up on that standard as soon as you finish doing to Lott what we've been trying to do since Impeachment. Now don't be bashful, have at it.
49 posted on 12/11/2002 2:04:22 PM PST by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
You are very welcome! Hey, and if I don't say it enough to fellow FReepers...have a great Holiday Season and I wish you the BEST - SAFE and HEALTHY New Year!
50 posted on 12/11/2002 2:06:17 PM PST by Caliban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Levin on Hannity right now.
51 posted on 12/11/2002 2:11:32 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
Then what was troubling in his statement?

I got it the first time I heard it, I knew he was not racist. You said "But what Sen. Lott *did* say is very troubling", so I assume you thought it was a racist statement. If not, then what was troubling?

I am sorry but I think this whole thing is about various agendas and no matter how much I want a new majority leader I will not say that praising a man who defended States Rights is "Troubling".
52 posted on 12/11/2002 2:17:55 PM PST by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
What was troubling was, as I've said repeatedly, his point about how we wouldn't be having all these problems we've been having.

That's troubling. Not his praise of Sen. Thurmond per se. But that comment. It does trouble me.
53 posted on 12/11/2002 2:30:46 PM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages

Okay, I guess I do not understand.

In my mind he is right. We would have allot less problems had we ever elected a pro states rights president.
54 posted on 12/11/2002 2:37:16 PM PST by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Great pic!

Of course the RATS dismiss Byrds as being ancient history, but they also ignored it when KKK Byrd started talking about "white niggers" on national TV only a year and a half ago. No moral outrage or demands that he resign from the race hustlers then, just "regret" over his "unfortunate choice of words".

55 posted on 12/11/2002 3:00:41 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
It's time to quit patronizing these socialists, and begin to use ridicule on them. Conservatives have nothing to apologize for, especially to these clowns.

Whenever some of my socialist neighbors start in with the same kind of crap, I literally laugh at them. It demonstrates how non-relevant they are.

It also makes them frustrated and mad as hell. A pox on all of them.

56 posted on 12/11/2002 4:03:07 PM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caliban
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too!
57 posted on 12/11/2002 4:54:35 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Ask yourself....what has Trent Lott accomplished... As either majority or minority leader? I can't think of a thing.

Well, one MAJOR accomplishment, to the sheer delight of the dems, was to disallow witnesses during the sham Senate Impeachment Trial thereby tying the hands of the Impeachment Managers.

58 posted on 12/11/2002 5:49:01 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
"and he's blowing this interview with Sean....big time!!!"

If Lott would ever shut up and listen for once, maybe he would have a clue.

He is blowing it again right now on Fox.

Your comment on what has he accomplished is interisting. I never thought about it until now..................Quick Answer: Nothing.

59 posted on 12/11/2002 6:14:29 PM PST by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
"tying the hands of the Impeachment Managers"

I forgot about that. Yes, that was an accomplishment. George Gekas told me, over coffee at a 7/11 that Lott was accompanied by Rick Santorum (R-PA), entered the room and said "It is Over, Clinton gets off".

Gekas told me, "That Bastard (Clinton) is gonna skate.".

60 posted on 12/11/2002 6:20:53 PM PST by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson