Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wizzler
If copyright law follows what the Constitution said 'for a limited time' it would be easier to respect. Also, trying to get people who wish to watch DVD's under Linux/xBDS thrown in jail is immoral and unethical.
9 posted on 12/11/2002 11:35:48 AM PST by Karsus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Karsus
What constitutes "limited time" is something reasonable people can disagree on, which is why such judgments are left to a democratic body such as Congress.

The sanctity of property rights, however, is not up for argument.

Nobody owes you or anyone else a disc that can be viewed under Linux. Sure, maybe their failure to cater to your format reveals a lack of business savvy. But it doesn't mean they're obligated to give you what you want, or to let you infringe their rights just so you can watch it the way you want. Successfully viewing the contents of a plastic disc on X, Y or Z operating system is not some God-given right of yours. A copyright owner protecting his property, on the other hand, is such a natural right.

Call the entertainment industry stupid, call them dinosaurs, call them Luddites. That's all fair. But they're in no way immoral for protecting their property.

It's too bad so many people who call themselves "conservative" -- which presumably entails a fundamental respect for property rights -- lose their philosophical compass on this issue.

10 posted on 12/11/2002 11:46:54 AM PST by wizzler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson