[aristeides]

What I said was that I thought you had outed yourself as a non-Republican. I don't think you'll be able to find a statement I made saying that you're a RAT.

[ApesForEvolution]

What defines a Republican? Blind loyalty? That's insane. I vote Republican, to date, all the time. I'm to the right of the vast majority of the Republican Party. My interest is in the preservation of America and it's founding principles, not the Republican Party per say. When the two entities can help to further each other with America being the first priority, so much the better. You might not have called me a RAT, but you alligned yourself with twits that did and echoed similar remarks. Anyway, lets move on. You want us to forget that Lott is a dolt and detriment and I don't want him to lead this new Republican Majority in the Senate because Lott is all to capable, as evidenced by his past, of bending over for RATS and damning the Constitution for his own purposes. He too puts party over country, if you want to give him the benefit of the doubt, which to me is unacceptable. If he quits the Senate altogether after he's challenged and ousted as leader, then he's the fool times two.