Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wasp69
One was an eye to eye face off that ended peacefully and the other was instructions to bomb cities.

The problem is that by the time this letter had been written, April 25, 1861, the die had been cast and a peaceful solution was no longer possible. The confederates had already bombarded Sumter and declared war. The southern army that had been massing since February was a very real danger. Had Maryland chosen to follow the other southern states into rebellion then the capitol and the administration would have been hundreds of miles behind what had to be considered enemy lines. So Lincoln would have had no choice. Maryand would have to be assumed as hostile as the other southern states and Scott would have been ordered to act accordingly.

91 posted on 12/13/2002 10:02:25 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Maryand would have to be assumed as hostile as the other southern states and Scott would have been ordered to act accordingly.

True and no argument here. However, there is no reason to shell cities. Armed troops ending civil strife is good, the shelling of a population center is not.
93 posted on 12/13/2002 10:15:06 AM PST by wasp69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson