Please. Do the defenders of the South constantly have to be referred to--even indirectly--as terrorists?
An aritcle that starts off with a name calling insult is not worthy of continuing (look at the first sentence). The author is bent on an agenda; that's not scholarly IMO.
it's about covering up the UN-lawful, hatefilled, arrogant, ignorant,statist, stupid acts of the damnyankees, not to speak of the THOUSANDS of WAR CRIMES committed against innocent civilians & Confederate POWs in the "care" of the filth that came down from the north.
free dixie,sw