Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
Nope. The issue could have been brought before the Supreme Court by any number of means.

Not really. The Supreme Court uses pretty strict guidelines to decide which cases it accepts. Among them, a party has to have standing in the case and has to have reason to appeal the lower court's ruling. In Merryman, the parties with standing and reason to appeal were The Lincoln, his administration, and the military. None of them did so.

150 posted on 12/23/2002 1:38:35 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
Nope. The issue could have been brought before the Supreme Court by any number of means.

Not really. The Supreme Court uses pretty strict guidelines to decide which cases it accepts. Among them, a party has to have standing in the case and has to have reason to appeal the lower court's ruling. In Merryman, the parties with standing and reason to appeal were The Lincoln, his administration, and the military. None of them did so.

What about Merryman himself? Was he willing to blow up bridges but not go before the Court?

Of course, as Mr. Lincoln noted, there was an "efficient corps of aiders and abettors" of treason loose in Maryland. Surely, the stopping of federal authorities from arresting people under suspension of the Writ would have helped Merryman's cause?

Lincoln oustwitted the traitors at every turn.

He saved Maryland for the Union and he saved the Union itself. That is what galls you.

But you hate the United States. Damn the United States to hell, right?

Walt

151 posted on 12/23/2002 1:44:16 PM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson