[Poohbah]

I will try to put this as simply as I can, in deference to your expressed attitudes.

It is one thing to express support for James Madison and how he helped move this Republic forward.

It's another thing to explicitly advocate the resumption of chattel slavery because "it would have prevented so many problems wev'e experienced since then."

[jwalsh07]

It's another thing to explicitly advocate the resumption of chattel slavery because "it would have prevented so many problems wev'e experienced since then."

I think you need a break Poobah, I'm starting to have trouble distinguishing your remarks from Peter Jenning's.

[puroresu]

"It is one thing to express support for James Madison and how he helped move this Republic forward.

It's another thing to explicitly advocate the resumption of chattel slavery because "it would have prevented so many problems wev'e experienced since then.""

How very liberal of you to put words in Senator Lott's mouth! Your analogy is a complete and total misfire, and I think you know it.

Did Senator Lott say that "resumption of segregation would have prevented so many of the problems we've experienced since then"?

No, he did not.

Case closed. His expressed opinion about Senator Thurmond was no more racist than my expression of admiration about the genius of one of our founders.

But the day is coming when such expressions will be condemned just as surely as Senator Lott's remarks. It's coming, and you're hurrying that day along by going along with this Politically Correct charade.