Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gatex
Could be because 18 USC 922(d) says "convicted in any court." ---Would assume Congress meant any U.S. court, but once written as "any," we are apparently lost.

Would "any" include the court in Iran that sentenced Salman Rushdie? If that's the court's thinking, then Rushdie ought not be allowed to defend himself against any Islamakazis that wish to enforce the Ayatollah's Fatwah. (Any liberal lurkers care to defend that aspect of this gun law?!?)

23 posted on 12/10/2002 1:28:21 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Redcloak
"Would "any" include the court in Iran that sentenced Salman Rushdie?..."

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals would probably say yes.

31 posted on 12/10/2002 1:47:54 PM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Would "any" include the court in Iran that sentenced Salman Rushdie?

We don't have a trade agreement with Iran,and they won't soon be a part of the same country. This is just setting the ground for our accepting Mexican law as part of our legal code.

52 posted on 12/10/2002 2:37:31 PM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson