[A Navy Vet]

Okay. My point is that state sanctioned or religious sanction marriages are not always considered valid in other countries and other religions. So his point about "sex is for husbands and wifes" is meaningless. I am more commited to my mate as a husband then any Elvis minister in Las Vegas could ever pronounce. If I'm not married in the eyes of the Christian church, I may be in the eyes of the Navajo. If I'm not legally married in the eys of the State of California, I may be in the eyes of Common Law.

To further elaborate, I'm not a Christian, a Jew, a Muslim, a Buddhist, a Hindu, a Pagan, or a subscriber of any other organized religion. So there is no controlling godly power to provide authority for me to have sex. And any California state laws that apply could become null and void depending on the society or culture I move to. Getting my point?

[Bluntpoint]

Your point was addressed above: Get a cantolope. Maybe a warm loaf of bread. I am still negotiating that.

[Karsus]

In his world you would more than likely be killed because you do not believe in God.

[Roscoe]

My point is that state sanctioned or religious sanction marriages are not always considered valid in other countries and other religions.

You're free to leave.

And any California state laws that apply could become null and void depending on the society or culture I move to. Getting my point?

You're free to leave.