UNNATURAL LAW (Supremes to review sodomy laws) liberal barf-and offensive content alert

NEW YORKER ^ | 12/16/02 issue | Hendrik Hertzberg

[Texaggie79]

Re Reason #1: So because of the socialist structure that has been put into place, we should be able to limit people's freedoms so that we can save money? Woohoo, O lover of liberty.


Re Reason #2: Ah, so even if your "theory" was correct do you propose that we incriminate activity just because it COULD lead somewhere illegal? So the whole idea of protecting people's rights gets thrown out the window and we instill a new standard of law which incriminates ANYTHING that could be perceived as something that could lead to illegal activity?

[DaGman]

It appears that there is a lot of "pick and choose" conservatism here. Pick and choose where the government can intrude on someone's life and where they can't.

[concerned about politics]

Sorry I dared to disagree with those that think they should be able to control what I do in my sex life. BTW, I am hetero. But I bet you assumed otherwise.

You might as well be a homosexual sodomite.
Birds of a feather flock together.
If you're heterosexual, why should I care what you do with your husband ?

[Bluntpoint]

Hey concerned, what are you doing after this thread? Lets get together.

[LO_IQ]

Homosexuality is wrong because it is against God's Word. Period.

Whether you get other consequences, you will find out sooner or later.

Bottom line. The Log Cabin Republicans have their own website.

This is not a "gay-affirming" board.

[Bella_Bru]

You might as well be a homosexual sodomite.

And why is that? Because when you say a married couple can do what they want in bed, you mean only missionary position, vaginal intercourse? So, I am a homosexual because I have oral sex with someone of the OPPOSITE sex? You need a dictionary. Badly.

[Bluntpoint]

Your husband is lucky to be married to a homosexual straight sex lover like yourself.

[concerned about politics]

It appears that there is a lot of "pick and choose" conservatism here. Pick and choose where the government can intrude on someone's life and where they can't.

When it becomes a public heath hazard to society, I feel the government has the right to step in.
Not only are we stuck funding AIDs, millions of taxpayer dollars, but the plagues from immune defeciency are starting. AIDs IS a mutating disease, which is why it can't be cured. It keeps changing.
There's now an incurable staff infection that grew out of autoimmune disease. Right now, most of it is contained in hospitals - right now,that is.
Then there's the overuse of antibiotics. Gays eat them like candy. Stomach infections from feces is a biggie, plus the intestional infections caused by forign objects.
Add the autoimmune staff infection mutation and the over use of antibiotics together, and we're heading for a huge plague like never before.
Should we remain "politically correct" in exchange for the possible demise of even more millions of human lives?
When do we say "enough" perversions? How many more will suffer simply for the lusts of 1% of the population?

[concerned about politics]

Hey concerned, what are you doing after this thread? Lets get together.

No . But thanks anyway. ( See how easy it is to just say "no"? LOL)

[Diverdogz]

What bothers me about the whole suit is that a couple of homosexuals will be responsible for destroying the entire Meals on Wheels program for the sake of a few bucks in their own pockets. Their sex is more important than millions of elderly people depending on that food.

Its a shame that the Salvation Army must use tax dollars forcibly taken from me to do their works of "charity".

[BikerNYC]

Met Jihadi yet?

Actually, yes. They just might be a match made in, um, well, somewhere.

[Bluntpoint]

Thank you for not viewing me as just another conquest.

[DannyTN]

Re:Reason#1 Absolutely, we do it all the time. I.E. Speed Limits, seatbelts, motorcycle helmets, health department codes, building codes, food inspectors, etc.

Re:Reason#2 Absolutely, we do it all the time.
We have a ton of laws designed to prevent illegal activity that you could argue infringes on people's liberties or imposes some burden. Sometimes we go overboard. This is not one of those times.

And since sodomy was never a "right" to begin with. I say protect the innocents from the sodomizers.

[concerned about politics]

And why is that? Because when you say a married couple can do what they want in bed, you mean only missionary position, vaginal intercourse? So, I am a homosexual because I have oral sex with someone of the OPPOSITE sex? You need a dictionary. Badly.

I'm sorry. You must have misunderstood. I approve heterosexual contacts. Men and woman are made for each other. Glad you and your husband are happy. It's nice.

[concerned about politics]

Its a shame that the Salvation Army must use tax dollars forcibly taken from me to do their works of "charity".

The elderly, those who spent their whole lives paying taxes, don't mind being fed. Go figure.

[Bluntpoint]

Hey, I tried telling her the same thing. However, now I am afraid to go bed with my wife. Listening to FF578, I think I might be a sodomite. If my wife turns me in to Chamber, I might be in for an awful time.

[concerned about politics]

Small government conservatives and social conservatives don't fit well together.

I'd like to debate that. Where are all the tax dollars spent? Where did bigger government come from? Why have all these committies?
Liberalism.
Cleaning up social problems caused by liberalism.
Welfare unwed mothers who need food stamps, housing, clothing, medical, dental, education....
Drug abuse programs, Aids funding, Alchohol and AAA, divorce and broken families, uneducated people from public schools.
The moral decline is how we got our big government in the first place! Now they want "Free proscription drugs and heathcare."

[Texaggie79]

Speed Limits, seatbelts, motorcycle helmets (ALL on PUBLIC owned property), health department codes, building codes, food inspectors (these are simply security blankets, the private sector would handle that MUCH better)

Our liberty is not something to be "experimented with". Liberty is the foundation of this nation. Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

"You show no respect for Freedom and, pretty soon, you have none." - Texaggie79 (in reply to DannyTN) Dec 10, 2002