Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Republicans Joins Democrats in Condemning Trent Lott's Remarks
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 12/10/02 | Marc Morano

Posted on 12/10/2002 3:02:00 AM PST by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - Two African American Republicans Monday joined several prominent Democrats in condemning Senate Republican leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) for his comments last week at the birthday party for retiring Senator Strom Thurmond.

Lott said that if Thurmond's 1948 presidential run had been successful, America would not have had "all these problems ..." Thurmond, running in 1948 as a Southern "Dixiecrat," advocated racial segregation at the time.

Nationally syndicated conservative columnist Armstrong Williams, an African American who served on Senator Thurmond's staff as an intern, told CNSNews.com that Senator Lott's comments "sent chills down my spine."

"I thought it was very inappropriate. The room gasped when he said it ... I don't see how anyone else can defend it. I am not going to defend it," said Williams, who attended the party marking Thurmond's 100th birthday.

Williams called Thurmond a "dear friend" and noted that the retiring senator [Thurmond] had "denounced his past" as a segregationist. "Those views are not representative of Strom Thurmond," he said.

Lott made the controversial remarks Thursday, Dec. 5 at the Dirksen Senate Office Building. "I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either."

Former Vice President Al Gore has called for the Senate to censure Lott, while activists Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have called for Lott's resignation.

Williams, normally a GOP ally, does not think GOP leaders should make excuses for Lott's statement.

"Republicans cannot run around trying to defend Trent Lott. He should apologize and explain what he tried to say instead of some two-sentence terse statement that he sent out," Williams added.

Lott's office issued a statement Sunday that read: "This was a lighthearted celebration of the 100th birthday of legendary Sen. Strom Thurmond. My comments were not an endorsement of his positions of over 50 years ago, but of the man and his life."

A request for further comment was turned down by Lott's office on Monday.

Williams is not impressed at Lott's handling of the situation.

"It's a joke! Come on man. Please, it's a joke and you know it only makes it worse, " Williams explained.

Harold Doley, a black Republican who has served the last five Republican presidents as a political appointee or advisory committee member, believes Lott's comments should prompt a change in Senate leadership.

"It shows he should not be the leader of the Republican Senate," Doley said in an interview with CNSNews.com.

"At a time when Republicans are trying to build the party to include the African American community, [Lott], in effect, takes an overtly segregationist position," Doley said.

[Lott] is giving the Democratic leadership exactly what they want in terms of the black vote. The GOP cannot continue to take constituencies out of play, we have to grow the party," he added.

"I am meeting with other African American Republicans who are trying to build the party ... we are going to ask Republican senators to vote for an alternative to [Lott]," Doley said.

Conservative African American activist Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, founder and president of the Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny (BOND), does not think the GOP should punish Lott.

"We have to realize that the liberal media, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and those people, they are desperate right now to regain power, and any little thing they can jump on to make the Republicans look like racists, they are going to use that to further their agenda," Peterson said.

Peterson said he believes Lott did not intend to be offensive. "There was just a sense of joy about [the event], he did not mean to be negative to black Americans or the civil rights movement at large," he explained.

Peterson believes the Democratic Party has its own racial problems.

"I suggest they first go after Senator [Robert] Byrd (D-W.Va.) who was a member of the KKK. He is in their party and then [the Democrats should] come after Lott." Peterson said.

"I think this is hypocrisy and a shameless act," he added.

But the comments of others should not serve as a defense for Lott, according to Armstrong Williams.

"Anybody in this day and time who makes that kind of statement should be condemned. I condemned Byrd and I condemn Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton for their racist statements and I am condemning Trent Lott."

The Senate GOP leader needs to change his views on race, Williams said.

"He's has some ignorance that he has to overcome. He has his own issues when it comes to this issue of race," Williams said of Lott.

But Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, (D-S.D.), defended Lott against racism charges on Monday.

"There are a lot of times when he and I go to the mike and would like to say things we meant to say differently, and I'm sure this is one of those cases for him as well," Daschle said.

E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

 



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: anniegetyourgun
Trent Lott may be in the wrong here (or not) but for him to resign now would be caving in to and legitimizing the black poverty pimps.
Fug 'em!
41 posted on 12/10/2002 8:39:10 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: maica
I don't want a Majority Leader who has no clue about the election of 1948. Smart people can be Republicans. We don't have to rely on retards like Lott.
43 posted on 12/10/2002 8:57:25 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I don't understand how someone could be so DENSE as to say such a thing. He doesn't believe it, so why in the world would he say it?

He shouldn't give them the satisfaction of stepping aside, but the Republicans need to pick someone else.

44 posted on 12/10/2002 8:59:53 AM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Be aware that the RATS over www.DUmpster.com are monitoring this thread.
45 posted on 12/10/2002 9:32:33 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts
Exactly! The sheer stupidity of the comment shows him to be even DUMBER than Byrd! Contrary to those crying about the "ambiguity" of the statement, Strom's '48 campaign boiled down to one issue: "States' Rights" was 95% about segregation, lets not kid ourselves. Only an idiot wouldn't have thought long and hard how to phrase his praise at that party. South Carolinians of all stripes love Strom, but for 80% of us (there are some bigots still slithering around) only because he repudiated the Dixiecrap. Lay the pigheadedness aside, folks: Republicans can't allow themselves to be pinned to the budding star of '04 Democratic ads.
46 posted on 12/10/2002 10:27:27 AM PST by NarniaSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Senator Lott has, in my opinion, been like the Lot of the Bible, a dazed good guy. A guy who needs to be saved out of difficult situations and one who's too loathe to take a strong stand on things. Sure, he's a conservative, but he'd do better in the background.

Tom Delay, for instance, is a much better straight-shooter and a guy who's willing to stand for what he believes. I like Delay, and he may one day become House Speaker.

As for Senator Lott, I think the Senate would have done a lot better if he'd offered strong, uncompromised leadership. If he's not prepared to offer that leadership, than perhaps he should step aside and just be another senator in order to allow a real leader in his place.
48 posted on 12/10/2002 12:00:08 PM PST by No dems 2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
I have no problem with him stepping down from his leadership post over this, particularly if Sen. Byrd is also disallowed from any leadership position of the D's in the Senate for his 'white nigger' comments of the recent past at the same time. Sounds like a fair trade, and we get Don Nickles out of the deal.
49 posted on 12/10/2002 1:42:07 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Sure, there are hypocrites on this issue among the Democrackheads but Lott can't be excused on this one. Even if he has a point it can't be adequately explained enough to satisfy folks.
50 posted on 12/10/2002 8:38:25 PM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson