OK, so a little before and after 7PM the Cal ISO couldn't keep track of load and generation to the point that it maintained adequate reserves. No problem. They just leaned on their neighboring load control areas endangering power in other regions.
I can't wait for the federal litigation to end and FERC to change the leadership control of the California ISO. The California ISO is going to cause a west coast blackout. They just are not to be trusted with running a power reliability and transmission system. They seem to have no concern about keeping the lights on and things operating within proper procedures. But after all what do I expect from an organization that is under the handpicked control of Gov Davis......
1 posted on
12/09/2002 9:36:58 AM PST by
Robert357
To: Robert357; lewislynn; snopercod; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thought you might be entertained by how the Cal ISO is performing.
One would think that Gov. Davis or someone in a political postiion of authority in California would want these guys to perform properly.
Oh course maybe they like the entertainment factor and suspence in waiting for blackouts during none peak periods of the year.
2 posted on
12/09/2002 9:41:11 AM PST by
Robert357
To: Robert357
Davis spent $20 billion to acquire power at during the
last energy shortage. This is reflected in the deficit
(except they will tell us that the shortfall is due
to the failure of California dotcoms).
To: Robert357
Only in Communist dictatorships, Haiti, Dominican Republic and Third World Countries like Kalifornia do they have rolling blackouts while those in power have all the electricity they want.
Wonder if Gov Davis has had to 'deal with' the power being off himself?
To: Robert357
California is sinking . . . sinking . . . sinking . . .
To: Robert357
Hey, the people have spoken, and this is what they want. And bread. And circuses...
25 posted on
12/09/2002 3:21:15 PM PST by
Imal
To: Robert357
"Sundays Notable Events: From 1857 to 1917, the California ISO was deficient in spinning reserve, to a maximum of 190 MW."
What does this actually mean in layman terms?
29 posted on
12/09/2002 5:45:47 PM PST by
lainie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson